Associative classification: A comprehensive analysis and empirical evaluation

Darshana H. Patel, N. Kotecha Radhika, A. Vasant
{"title":"Associative classification: A comprehensive analysis and empirical evaluation","authors":"Darshana H. Patel, N. Kotecha Radhika, A. Vasant","doi":"10.1109/NUICONE.2017.8325616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Databases are rich with concealed information which can be used for intelligent decision making. Classification and association rule mining are vital to such practical applications. Thus, if these two techniques are somehow integrated would result in great savings and conveniences to the user. Such an integrated framework is called associative classification (AC). This integration is carried out by focusing on a specific subset of association rules whose consequent contains only class attribute. Several studies in data mining have shown that AC is superior to other traditional classification algorithms due to its numerous favorable characteristics such as readability, usability, training efficient and excellent accuracy. Hence, various AC techniques are studied with its pros and cons. However, AC suffers from a drawback that large number of rules is produced as an output. Now, utilizing all these rules for analysis would be computationally expensive. This paper studies various pruning and evaluation methods that are employed to produce qualitative rules. Further, the paper empirically evaluates associative classification technique considering various parameters.","PeriodicalId":306637,"journal":{"name":"2017 Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NUICONE.2017.8325616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Databases are rich with concealed information which can be used for intelligent decision making. Classification and association rule mining are vital to such practical applications. Thus, if these two techniques are somehow integrated would result in great savings and conveniences to the user. Such an integrated framework is called associative classification (AC). This integration is carried out by focusing on a specific subset of association rules whose consequent contains only class attribute. Several studies in data mining have shown that AC is superior to other traditional classification algorithms due to its numerous favorable characteristics such as readability, usability, training efficient and excellent accuracy. Hence, various AC techniques are studied with its pros and cons. However, AC suffers from a drawback that large number of rules is produced as an output. Now, utilizing all these rules for analysis would be computationally expensive. This paper studies various pruning and evaluation methods that are employed to produce qualitative rules. Further, the paper empirically evaluates associative classification technique considering various parameters.
联想分类:综合分析和实证评价
数据库中隐藏着丰富的信息,可用于智能决策。分类和关联规则挖掘对于此类实际应用至关重要。因此,如果将这两种技术以某种方式集成在一起,将为用户带来极大的节省和便利。这样一个集成的框架被称为关联分类(AC)。这种集成是通过关注关联规则的特定子集来实现的,其结果只包含类属性。数据挖掘领域的多项研究表明,AC算法具有可读性、可用性、训练效率高、准确率高等优点,优于其他传统的分类算法。因此,研究了各种交流技术的优缺点。然而,交流有一个缺点,即作为输出产生大量规则。现在,利用所有这些规则进行分析在计算上是昂贵的。本文研究了用于生成定性规则的各种修剪和评价方法。在此基础上,对考虑多种参数的关联分类技术进行了实证评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信