Concluding Remarks on Linguistic Equality, Strategic Pluralism, and Linguistic Justice

J. Leung
{"title":"Concluding Remarks on Linguistic Equality, Strategic Pluralism, and Linguistic Justice","authors":"J. Leung","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190210335.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since equality is a foundation of liberalism and a moral norm, the value of linguistic equality is easily taken for granted. This chapter offers a characterization of linguistic equality as it is claimed and practiced in bilingual and multilingual jurisdictions today. It argues that shallow equality must not be confused with equality that is difference-blind and universal. Both symbolic jurisprudence and shallow equality are properties of a policy of strategic pluralism. The symbolic nature of official language law and the shallow character of linguistic equality do not prevent official multilingualism from serving legitimate goals. Official multilingualism is not morally superior to official monolingualism. Both are viable strategies for the survival of a polity. Although this book has been primarily concerned with the descriptive and analytical questions of how to make sense of official multilingualism, it concludes with some insights that may illuminate normative questions about linguistic justice.","PeriodicalId":286357,"journal":{"name":"Shallow Equality and Symbolic Jurisprudence in Multilingual Legal Orders","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shallow Equality and Symbolic Jurisprudence in Multilingual Legal Orders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190210335.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since equality is a foundation of liberalism and a moral norm, the value of linguistic equality is easily taken for granted. This chapter offers a characterization of linguistic equality as it is claimed and practiced in bilingual and multilingual jurisdictions today. It argues that shallow equality must not be confused with equality that is difference-blind and universal. Both symbolic jurisprudence and shallow equality are properties of a policy of strategic pluralism. The symbolic nature of official language law and the shallow character of linguistic equality do not prevent official multilingualism from serving legitimate goals. Official multilingualism is not morally superior to official monolingualism. Both are viable strategies for the survival of a polity. Although this book has been primarily concerned with the descriptive and analytical questions of how to make sense of official multilingualism, it concludes with some insights that may illuminate normative questions about linguistic justice.
语言平等、战略多元化与语言公正
由于平等是自由主义的基础和道德规范,语言平等的价值很容易被视为理所当然。本章提供了语言平等的特征,因为它是主张和实践在今天的双语和多语司法管辖区。本文认为,不能将肤浅的平等与无视差异的普遍平等混为一谈。象征法理学和浅平等都是战略多元主义政策的属性。官方语言法的象征性和语言平等的肤浅性并不妨碍官方多语制为合法目的服务。官方多语制在道德上并不比官方单语制优越。两者都是一个政体生存的可行策略。尽管本书主要关注的是如何理解官方多语制的描述性和分析性问题,但它总结了一些可能阐明有关语言正义的规范性问题的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信