J. Gaskell, Nazareno Campioni, J. Morales, D. Husmeier, C. Torney
{"title":"Approximate Bayesian Inference for Individual-based Models with Emergent Dynamics","authors":"J. Gaskell, Nazareno Campioni, J. Morales, D. Husmeier, C. Torney","doi":"10.11159/icsta20.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual-based models are used in a variety of scientific domains to study systems composed of multiple agents that interact \nwith one another and lead to complex emergent dynamics at the macroscale. A standard approach in the analysis of these systems is \nto specify the microscale interaction rules in a simulation model, run simulations, and then qualitatively compare outputs to empirical \nobservations. Recently, more robust methods for inference for these types of models have been introduced, notably approximate Bayesian \ncomputation, however major challenges remain due to the computational cost of simulations and the nonlinear nature of many complex \nsystems. Here, we compare two methods of approximate inference in a classic individual-based model of group dynamics with well-studied \nnonlinear macroscale behaviour; we employ a Gaussian process accelerated ABC method with an approximated likelihood and with a \nsynthetic likelihood. We compare the accuracy of results when re-inferring parameters using a measure of macro-scale disorder (the \norder parameter) as a summary statistic. Our findings reveal that for a canonical simple model of animal collective movement, parameter \ninference is accurate and computationally efficient, even when the model is poised at the critical transition between order and disorder.","PeriodicalId":302827,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/icsta20.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Individual-based models are used in a variety of scientific domains to study systems composed of multiple agents that interact
with one another and lead to complex emergent dynamics at the macroscale. A standard approach in the analysis of these systems is
to specify the microscale interaction rules in a simulation model, run simulations, and then qualitatively compare outputs to empirical
observations. Recently, more robust methods for inference for these types of models have been introduced, notably approximate Bayesian
computation, however major challenges remain due to the computational cost of simulations and the nonlinear nature of many complex
systems. Here, we compare two methods of approximate inference in a classic individual-based model of group dynamics with well-studied
nonlinear macroscale behaviour; we employ a Gaussian process accelerated ABC method with an approximated likelihood and with a
synthetic likelihood. We compare the accuracy of results when re-inferring parameters using a measure of macro-scale disorder (the
order parameter) as a summary statistic. Our findings reveal that for a canonical simple model of animal collective movement, parameter
inference is accurate and computationally efficient, even when the model is poised at the critical transition between order and disorder.