Automation Bias and the Principles of Judicial Review

Tatiana Kazim, Joe Tomlinson
{"title":"Automation Bias and the Principles of Judicial Review","authors":"Tatiana Kazim, Joe Tomlinson","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2189405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Though much of it remains out of sight, it is no secret that the use of automated decision-making systems in government is now widespread and growing. In practice, many such systems are partially, rather than fully, automated; there is a ‘human in the loop’. In such a system, there are a range of downstream risks in respect of the quality of administrative decision-making. One such potential risk is automation bias – a welldocumented psychological phenomenon whereby decision-makers put too much, or inappropriate, trust in computers and thus effectively abdicate to some extent their own discretionary judgement. The question of how judicial review may respond to this risk is on the horizon.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2189405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. Though much of it remains out of sight, it is no secret that the use of automated decision-making systems in government is now widespread and growing. In practice, many such systems are partially, rather than fully, automated; there is a ‘human in the loop’. In such a system, there are a range of downstream risks in respect of the quality of administrative decision-making. One such potential risk is automation bias – a welldocumented psychological phenomenon whereby decision-makers put too much, or inappropriate, trust in computers and thus effectively abdicate to some extent their own discretionary judgement. The question of how judicial review may respond to this risk is on the horizon.
自动化偏见与司法审查原则
1. 尽管其中的大部分仍未被人们所知,但自动化决策系统在政府中的应用已经广泛且不断增长,这已经不是什么秘密了。实际上,许多这样的系统是部分自动化的,而不是完全自动化的;这里有一个“人在循环”。在这样一个系统中,在行政决策质量方面存在一系列下游风险。其中一个潜在风险是自动化偏见——这是一种有据可查的心理现象,即决策者过分或不适当地信任计算机,从而在某种程度上有效地放弃了自己的自由裁量判断。司法审查如何应对这种风险的问题即将出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信