ANALISIS YURIDIS SUBROGASI DENGAN PENGALIHAN KREDIT YANG TERIKAT HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO) TBK. CABANG KABANJAHE

Lucy Margareth Napitupulu
{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS SUBROGASI DENGAN PENGALIHAN KREDIT YANG TERIKAT HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO) TBK. CABANG KABANJAHE","authors":"Lucy Margareth Napitupulu","doi":"10.34012/jihap.v4i1.1635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All business sectors or individuals today and in the future cannot be separated from banking sector. In order to balance and harmonize this need, the role of bank is to provide loan fund through loan. Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI, in providing loans, makes efforts and competes to create innovations to their products as their strategies to get prime consumer debtor candidate including debtors who performs loan takeover. Loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI is the provision of new loans to consumer debtor, which aims to pay consumer debtor’s ongoing loans, with land title as mortgage rights of the loan that is bound with mortgage right in the older bank, so that Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI replaces rights of the older bank. Loan takeover that is bound with mortgage rights in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI is related to the provisions of subrogation in the Civil Code.This research employs empirical juridical method which is descriptive. It describes, studies, explains, and analyzes theoretical and practical legal regulations on mechanism and legal consequences for loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI, and whether the loan takeover is in line with the provisions of subrogation in the Civil Code.The results of the research explains the mechanism of loan takeover. It is done by submitting an application for loan by candidate consumer debtor to be processed, and then the loan is realized and transferred. The legal consequences for loan takeover is the emergence of a loan agreement between customer debtor and Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI and the termination of the loan agreement between the customer debtor and the older bank; the elimination of mortgage right for and in the name of the older bank and the emergence of mortgage right for and in the name of Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI; the termination of the position of older bank as creditor and holder of the mortgage right of customer debtor and mortgage right grantor. The implementation of the loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI has been in line with the provision son subrogation, namely Article 1400 of the Civil Code, particularly Article 1400 sub 2 of the Civil Code.It is suggested that the Law further regulate provisions on subrogation that are in line with the banking development today, so that loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right can fully/completely implement the provision on subrogation as well in the future. It is expected that more references discuss about the legal consequences for loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right. It is also expected that subrogation be introduced and implemented again in banking practice and Notary, because it is in line with the provision son subrogation in the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":322379,"journal":{"name":"Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34012/jihap.v4i1.1635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All business sectors or individuals today and in the future cannot be separated from banking sector. In order to balance and harmonize this need, the role of bank is to provide loan fund through loan. Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI, in providing loans, makes efforts and competes to create innovations to their products as their strategies to get prime consumer debtor candidate including debtors who performs loan takeover. Loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI is the provision of new loans to consumer debtor, which aims to pay consumer debtor’s ongoing loans, with land title as mortgage rights of the loan that is bound with mortgage right in the older bank, so that Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI replaces rights of the older bank. Loan takeover that is bound with mortgage rights in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI is related to the provisions of subrogation in the Civil Code.This research employs empirical juridical method which is descriptive. It describes, studies, explains, and analyzes theoretical and practical legal regulations on mechanism and legal consequences for loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI, and whether the loan takeover is in line with the provisions of subrogation in the Civil Code.The results of the research explains the mechanism of loan takeover. It is done by submitting an application for loan by candidate consumer debtor to be processed, and then the loan is realized and transferred. The legal consequences for loan takeover is the emergence of a loan agreement between customer debtor and Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI and the termination of the loan agreement between the customer debtor and the older bank; the elimination of mortgage right for and in the name of the older bank and the emergence of mortgage right for and in the name of Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI; the termination of the position of older bank as creditor and holder of the mortgage right of customer debtor and mortgage right grantor. The implementation of the loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right in Kabanjahe Branch Office of BRI has been in line with the provision son subrogation, namely Article 1400 of the Civil Code, particularly Article 1400 sub 2 of the Civil Code.It is suggested that the Law further regulate provisions on subrogation that are in line with the banking development today, so that loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right can fully/completely implement the provision on subrogation as well in the future. It is expected that more references discuss about the legal consequences for loan takeover that is bound with mortgage right. It is also expected that subrogation be introduced and implemented again in banking practice and Notary, because it is in line with the provision son subrogation in the Civil Code.
分析judis subrotion与与PT. cisero TBK相关的信用转移有关的分析。KABANJAHE分部
无论是现在还是将来,所有的商业部门或个人都离不开银行部门。为了平衡和协调这种需求,银行的作用是通过贷款提供贷款资金。BRI Kabanjahe分支机构在提供贷款时,努力并竞争创造产品创新,作为获得主要消费者债务人候选人(包括执行贷款接管的债务人)的策略。BRI Kabanjahe分行与抵押权绑定的贷款接管是指向消费者债务人提供新的贷款,目的是支付消费者债务人正在进行的贷款,以土地所有权作为与旧银行抵押权绑定的贷款的抵押权,使BRI Kabanjahe分行取代旧银行的权利。BRI Kabanjahe分行与抵押权利相绑定的贷款接管与《民法典》中代位求偿权的规定有关。本研究采用实证法的描述性研究方法。描述、研究、解释、分析了BRI卡班贾赫分行与抵押权绑定的贷款接管机制和法律后果的理论和实践法律规定,以及贷款接管是否符合《民法典》代位求偿的规定。研究结果解释了贷款接管的机制。它是通过由候选消费者债务人提交待处理的贷款申请,然后实现贷款并转让来完成的。贷款接管的法律后果是客户债务人与BRI Kabanjahe分行之间出现贷款协议,以及客户债务人与旧银行之间的贷款协议终止;取消老银行的抵押权和以老银行名义的抵押权,出现“一带一路”Kabanjahe分行的抵押权和以老银行名义的抵押权;旧银行作为债权人、客户债务人抵押权持有人和抵押权授予人的地位的终止。BRI Kabanjahe分行与抵押权绑定的贷款接管的实施符合代位求偿权的规定,即《民法典》第1400条,特别是《民法典》第1400条第2款。建议该法进一步规范代位求偿权的规定,使之符合当今银行业的发展,使今后与抵押权相绑定的贷款接管也能全面/完全地落实代位求偿权的规定。期望有更多的文献对与抵押权绑定的贷款接管的法律后果进行探讨。代位求偿权也有望在银行业和公证业中重新引入和实施,因为它符合《民法典》中关于代位求偿权的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信