Realities of participatory community-based environmental rehabilitation projects: a case study of soil erosion countermeasures in western Kenya

Y. Yamane
{"title":"Realities of participatory community-based environmental rehabilitation projects: a case study of soil erosion countermeasures in western Kenya","authors":"Y. Yamane","doi":"10.4314/jdcs.v6i1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to describe the realities of participatory development projects in western Kenya, where severe soil degradation has occurred, using participatory observation methods. Six aid organizations administered development projects for environmental rehabilitation in the area; however, less than 10% of study area residents participated in project activities. This article argues that this lack of participation was fuelled by a disjuncture of understanding between aid organizations, community-based development organizations, and area residents about project purposes and goals. It suggests that in order for participatory development projects to be successful all stakeholders must understand and take ownership of the project. People who the aid organization called “community” often turned out to be a collection of unconnected people. In addition, not everyone who was involved participated out of a desire to stop soil erosion. Many people were not directly impacted by the gullies and their motivation for participation was purely for economic reasons. Thus, growing seedlings and planting them was seen more as a source of income than as a way to repair and restore the local environment. Such motivations need to be considered when creating participatory development projectsKeywords: participatory development, community development, environmental rehabilitation, Luo, Kenya","PeriodicalId":224263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development and Communication Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development and Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jdcs.v6i1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempts to describe the realities of participatory development projects in western Kenya, where severe soil degradation has occurred, using participatory observation methods. Six aid organizations administered development projects for environmental rehabilitation in the area; however, less than 10% of study area residents participated in project activities. This article argues that this lack of participation was fuelled by a disjuncture of understanding between aid organizations, community-based development organizations, and area residents about project purposes and goals. It suggests that in order for participatory development projects to be successful all stakeholders must understand and take ownership of the project. People who the aid organization called “community” often turned out to be a collection of unconnected people. In addition, not everyone who was involved participated out of a desire to stop soil erosion. Many people were not directly impacted by the gullies and their motivation for participation was purely for economic reasons. Thus, growing seedlings and planting them was seen more as a source of income than as a way to repair and restore the local environment. Such motivations need to be considered when creating participatory development projectsKeywords: participatory development, community development, environmental rehabilitation, Luo, Kenya
参与性社区环境恢复项目的现实:肯尼亚西部土壤侵蚀对策案例研究
本研究试图利用参与性观察方法,描述肯尼亚西部发生严重土壤退化的参与性发展项目的现实情况。六个援助组织管理该地区环境恢复的发展项目;然而,不到10%的研究区居民参与了项目活动。本文认为,缺乏参与是由于援助组织、社区发展组织和地区居民之间对项目目的和目标的理解脱节造成的。它表明,为了使参与式发展项目取得成功,所有利益相关者必须了解并承担项目的所有权。被援助组织称为“社区”的人往往是一群没有联系的人。此外,并非所有参与的人都是出于阻止土壤侵蚀的愿望。许多人并没有受到沟壑的直接影响,他们参与的动机纯粹是出于经济原因。因此,种植秧苗更多地被视为一种收入来源,而不是一种修复和恢复当地环境的方式。在创建参与式发展项目时需要考虑这些动机。关键词:参与式发展,社区发展,环境修复,罗,肯尼亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信