E-123 Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transradial access for mechanical thrombectomy inacute ischemic stroke – A single center experience

A. Kühn, J. Singh, K. Rodrigues, F. Massari, M. Gounis, A. Puri
{"title":"E-123 Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transradial access for mechanical thrombectomy inacute ischemic stroke – A single center experience","authors":"A. Kühn, J. Singh, K. Rodrigues, F. Massari, M. Gounis, A. Puri","doi":"10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"spectively maintained Neuro IR database and identified all patients who underwent transradial access for their diagnostic or interventional procedure between May 2019 and January 2021. Patient demographics, clinical information, procedural and radiographic data were collected. Results We identified 749 patients in whom transradial access was obtained for either diagnostic and interventional Neuro IR procedures. Access was obtained using a 5F/6F/7F radial sheath. In some procedures, the sheath was exchanged for the guide catheter which was then inserted in a bareback (sheathless) fashion. Interventional procedures performed included carotid artery stenting, stroke thrombectomy, intracranial stenting, thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion, aneurysm treatment (with coiling or stent-assisted coiling, flow diverters or Woven EndoBridge device placement), vasospasm treatment, arteriovenous malformation and dural arteriovenous fistula embolization, middle meningeal artery embolization, and spinal angiography with embolization. A total of 12 access site complications were recorded (1.6%) with 4 access site hematomas, 3 inflammatory changes at the puncture site, 2 asymptomatic radial artery occlusions, 2 radial artery injuries (1 self-limiting wire perforation and 1 perforation which was coiled via transfemoral route without any clinical sequela) and 1 retained broken microwire which was successfully removed in a subsequent session. None of the complications resulted in permanent local or neurological deficits. Conclusion The transradial approach for diagnostic and interventional Neuro IR procedures is a safe vascular access choice. Disclosures A. Kuhn: None. J. Singh: None. A. McGowan: None. M. Kirk: None. F. Massari: None. K. de Macedo Rodrigues: None. V. Naragum: None. V. Anagnostakou: None. M. Gounis: 1; C; National Institutes of Health (NIH), the United States – Israel Binational Science Foundation, Anaconda, ApicBio, Axovant, Cerenovus, Cook Medical, Gentuity, Imperative Care, InNeuroCo, Magneto. 2; C; Cerenovus, Imperative Care, phenox, Medtronic Neurovascular, Route 92 Medical, Stryker Neurovascular. 4; C; Imperative Care, InNeuroCo and Neurogami. A. Puri: 1; C; NIH, Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Cerenovus. 2; C; Microvention, QApel, Perfuze Medical, Arsenal Medical, Merit Medical, Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Cerenovus. 4; C; InNeuroCo Inc, Galaxy therapeutics, Agile Medical, Perfuze medical and NTI.","PeriodicalId":239958,"journal":{"name":"Electronic poster abstracts","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic poster abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

spectively maintained Neuro IR database and identified all patients who underwent transradial access for their diagnostic or interventional procedure between May 2019 and January 2021. Patient demographics, clinical information, procedural and radiographic data were collected. Results We identified 749 patients in whom transradial access was obtained for either diagnostic and interventional Neuro IR procedures. Access was obtained using a 5F/6F/7F radial sheath. In some procedures, the sheath was exchanged for the guide catheter which was then inserted in a bareback (sheathless) fashion. Interventional procedures performed included carotid artery stenting, stroke thrombectomy, intracranial stenting, thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion, aneurysm treatment (with coiling or stent-assisted coiling, flow diverters or Woven EndoBridge device placement), vasospasm treatment, arteriovenous malformation and dural arteriovenous fistula embolization, middle meningeal artery embolization, and spinal angiography with embolization. A total of 12 access site complications were recorded (1.6%) with 4 access site hematomas, 3 inflammatory changes at the puncture site, 2 asymptomatic radial artery occlusions, 2 radial artery injuries (1 self-limiting wire perforation and 1 perforation which was coiled via transfemoral route without any clinical sequela) and 1 retained broken microwire which was successfully removed in a subsequent session. None of the complications resulted in permanent local or neurological deficits. Conclusion The transradial approach for diagnostic and interventional Neuro IR procedures is a safe vascular access choice. Disclosures A. Kuhn: None. J. Singh: None. A. McGowan: None. M. Kirk: None. F. Massari: None. K. de Macedo Rodrigues: None. V. Naragum: None. V. Anagnostakou: None. M. Gounis: 1; C; National Institutes of Health (NIH), the United States – Israel Binational Science Foundation, Anaconda, ApicBio, Axovant, Cerenovus, Cook Medical, Gentuity, Imperative Care, InNeuroCo, Magneto. 2; C; Cerenovus, Imperative Care, phenox, Medtronic Neurovascular, Route 92 Medical, Stryker Neurovascular. 4; C; Imperative Care, InNeuroCo and Neurogami. A. Puri: 1; C; NIH, Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Cerenovus. 2; C; Microvention, QApel, Perfuze Medical, Arsenal Medical, Merit Medical, Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Cerenovus. 4; C; InNeuroCo Inc, Galaxy therapeutics, Agile Medical, Perfuze medical and NTI.
E-123急性缺血性卒中机械取栓经桡动脉通路的安全性和有效性评价-单中心经验
分别维护Neuro IR数据库,并确定2019年5月至2021年1月期间接受经桡骨通路诊断或介入手术的所有患者。收集患者人口统计资料、临床信息、手术和放射学数据。结果:我们确定了749例患者,他们在诊断和介入性神经IR手术中获得了经桡动脉通路。使用5F/6F/7F径向护套获得通道。在一些手术中,导管鞘被替换成导导管,然后以无套(无套)的方式插入。介入手术包括颈动脉支架置入术、卒中血栓切除术、颅内支架置入术、视网膜中央动脉闭塞溶栓、动脉瘤治疗(使用支架盘绕或支架辅助盘绕、分流器或Woven EndoBridge装置置入)、血管痉挛治疗、动静脉畸形和硬脑膜动静脉瘘栓塞、脑膜中动脉栓塞和脊髓血管造影栓塞。共记录了12例(1.6%)通路并发症,其中4例通路血肿,3例穿刺部位炎症改变,2例无症状桡动脉闭塞,2例桡动脉损伤(1例自限性金属丝穿孔,1例经股动脉缠绕穿孔,无临床后遗症),1例保留断裂的微丝,并在随后的治疗中成功取出。没有任何并发症导致永久性的局部或神经功能缺损。结论经桡动脉入路是诊断和介入神经红外手术的安全途径。库恩:没有。J.辛格:没有。A.麦高恩:没有。柯克:没有。马萨里:没有。K. de Macedo Rodrigues:没有。V. Naragum:没有。V. anagnoakou:没有。古尼斯先生:1;C;美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)、美国-以色列两国科学基金会、Anaconda、ApicBio、Axovant、Cerenovus、Cook Medical、genuity、Imperative Care、InNeuroCo、Magneto 1;C;3 . Cerenovus、Imperative Care、phenox、Medtronic Neurovascular、Route 92 Medical、Stryker Neurovascular;C;Imperative Care, InNeuroCo和Neurogami。A. Puri: 1;C;NIH, Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Cerenovus. 2;C;3 . Microvention、QApel、perffuse Medical、Arsenal Medical、Merit Medical、Stryker Neurovascular、Medtronic、Cerenovus;C;InNeuroCo Inc, Galaxy therapeutics, Agile Medical, Perfuze Medical和NTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信