The HEIC application framework for implementing XAI-based socio-technical systems

Q1 Social Sciences
Jose N. Paredes , Juan Carlos L. Teze , Maria Vanina Martinez , Gerardo I. Simari
{"title":"The HEIC application framework for implementing XAI-based socio-technical systems","authors":"Jose N. Paredes ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos L. Teze ,&nbsp;Maria Vanina Martinez ,&nbsp;Gerardo I. Simari","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The development of data-driven Artificial Intelligence<span> systems has seen successful application in diverse domains related to social platforms; however, many of these systems cannot explain the rationale behind their decisions. This is a major drawback, especially in critical domains such as those related to cybersecurity, of which malicious behavior on social platforms is a clear example. In light of this problem, in this paper we make several contributions: (i) a proposal of desiderata for the explanation of outputs generated by AI-based cybersecurity systems; (ii) a review of approaches in the literature on </span></span>Explainable AI (XAI) under the lens of both our desiderata and further dimensions that are typically used for examining XAI approaches; (iii) the </span><em>Hybrid Explainable and Interpretable Cybersecurity</em><span> (HEIC) application framework that can serve as a roadmap for guiding R&amp;D efforts towards XAI-based socio-technical systems; (iv) an example instantiation of the proposed framework in a news recommendation setting, where a portion of news articles are assumed to be fake news; and (v) exploration of various types of explanations that can help different kinds of users to identify real vs. fake news in social platform settings.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The development of data-driven Artificial Intelligence systems has seen successful application in diverse domains related to social platforms; however, many of these systems cannot explain the rationale behind their decisions. This is a major drawback, especially in critical domains such as those related to cybersecurity, of which malicious behavior on social platforms is a clear example. In light of this problem, in this paper we make several contributions: (i) a proposal of desiderata for the explanation of outputs generated by AI-based cybersecurity systems; (ii) a review of approaches in the literature on Explainable AI (XAI) under the lens of both our desiderata and further dimensions that are typically used for examining XAI approaches; (iii) the Hybrid Explainable and Interpretable Cybersecurity (HEIC) application framework that can serve as a roadmap for guiding R&D efforts towards XAI-based socio-technical systems; (iv) an example instantiation of the proposed framework in a news recommendation setting, where a portion of news articles are assumed to be fake news; and (v) exploration of various types of explanations that can help different kinds of users to identify real vs. fake news in social platform settings.

用于实现基于xai的社会技术系统的HEIC应用框架
数据驱动的人工智能系统的发展已经成功地应用于与社交平台相关的各个领域;然而,这些系统中的许多都无法解释其决策背后的基本原理。这是一个主要的缺点,特别是在与网络安全相关的关键领域,社交平台上的恶意行为就是一个明显的例子。针对这一问题,我们在本文中做出了几点贡献:(i)提出了解释基于人工智能的网络安全系统产生的输出的理想数据;(ii)在我们的期望和通常用于检查XAI方法的进一步维度的镜头下,对可解释AI (XAI)文献中的方法进行回顾;(iii)可解释和可解释的混合网络安全(HEIC)应用框架,可作为指导研发工作走向基于xai的社会技术系统的路线图;(iv)在新闻推荐设置中所建议框架的示例实例化,其中部分新闻文章被假定为假新闻;(v)探索各种类型的解释,帮助不同类型的用户在社交平台环境中识别真假新闻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信