The Mystery of the Missing Objects: Do Archaeological Artefacts and Liturgical Objects Support the Story of (As)Syrians in Kartli?

E. Leeming
{"title":"The Mystery of the Missing Objects: Do Archaeological Artefacts and Liturgical Objects Support the Story of (As)Syrians in Kartli?","authors":"E. Leeming","doi":"10.1163/9789004375314_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the assertions anyone exploring the history of the (As)Syrian Fathers encounters in Georgia today is that there is a great deal of physical evidence to attest to the presence of Syrians in late antique Kartli. Given the fact that Syrian-made glass in particular is ubiquitous across the Roman Empire this statement comes as no surprise—it would be more of a shock if there were no evidence of Syrian artefacts in Kartli at the time of its evangelisation and in the centuries immediately following this event. However, when it comes to looking at these claims of Syrian objects in more detail the situation swiftly changes. In the first place there is very little material securely provenanced as Syrian on display in the National Museum collections. At first glance a visitor could attribute this to the fact that currently only a very small selection of the collection is on view to visitors and, in the case of the late antique and early medieval holdings, only themost intrinsically valuable objects are easily accessible to the public in the treasuries of Simon Janashia Museum of Georgia and the Shalva Amiranashvili Museum of Fine Arts respectively. Difficult as it is to gather information about Syrian artefacts in Georgia, that task seems simple when set against the difficulty of trying to find evidence of ‘Iberians’ in Syria. Since nobody had set themselves the task of quantifying Georgian material in Syrian collections before the civil war began, it is now unclear when or if such a study will be possible in the future. What we can state is that there are no Georgian inscriptions or artefacts recorded in collections in the Syrian Arab Republic today. On the other hand there is a great deal of archaeological evidence attesting to theGeorgian presence in theHatay region of Turkey, which of course was a province of Syria until 1939. Djobadze extensively surveyed the hinterland of Antioch (modern Antakya) and conducted a series of archaeological explorations that conclusively proved the presence of Georgian monks on Semandaǧ, at the monastery of St. Symeon Stylites the Younger and elsewhere in the vicinity, notably in the region known","PeriodicalId":137518,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Asceticism: Cultural interaction between Syria and Georgia in Late Antiquity","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Asceticism: Cultural interaction between Syria and Georgia in Late Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375314_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the assertions anyone exploring the history of the (As)Syrian Fathers encounters in Georgia today is that there is a great deal of physical evidence to attest to the presence of Syrians in late antique Kartli. Given the fact that Syrian-made glass in particular is ubiquitous across the Roman Empire this statement comes as no surprise—it would be more of a shock if there were no evidence of Syrian artefacts in Kartli at the time of its evangelisation and in the centuries immediately following this event. However, when it comes to looking at these claims of Syrian objects in more detail the situation swiftly changes. In the first place there is very little material securely provenanced as Syrian on display in the National Museum collections. At first glance a visitor could attribute this to the fact that currently only a very small selection of the collection is on view to visitors and, in the case of the late antique and early medieval holdings, only themost intrinsically valuable objects are easily accessible to the public in the treasuries of Simon Janashia Museum of Georgia and the Shalva Amiranashvili Museum of Fine Arts respectively. Difficult as it is to gather information about Syrian artefacts in Georgia, that task seems simple when set against the difficulty of trying to find evidence of ‘Iberians’ in Syria. Since nobody had set themselves the task of quantifying Georgian material in Syrian collections before the civil war began, it is now unclear when or if such a study will be possible in the future. What we can state is that there are no Georgian inscriptions or artefacts recorded in collections in the Syrian Arab Republic today. On the other hand there is a great deal of archaeological evidence attesting to theGeorgian presence in theHatay region of Turkey, which of course was a province of Syria until 1939. Djobadze extensively surveyed the hinterland of Antioch (modern Antakya) and conducted a series of archaeological explorations that conclusively proved the presence of Georgian monks on Semandaǧ, at the monastery of St. Symeon Stylites the Younger and elsewhere in the vicinity, notably in the region known
失踪物品之谜:考古文物和礼仪物品是否支持(As)叙利亚人在卡特利的故事?
任何研究叙利亚神父在格鲁吉亚的历史的人都会断言,有大量的实物证据可以证明叙利亚人在古代晚期的卡特利的存在。考虑到叙利亚制造的玻璃在整个罗马帝国无处不在,这一说法并不令人惊讶——如果在卡特利传福音时期和事件发生后的几个世纪里没有叙利亚文物的证据,那将是更令人震惊的。然而,当涉及到更详细地审视这些叙利亚物品的主张时,情况迅速发生了变化。首先,在国家博物馆的藏品中,只有很少的材料被证明是叙利亚的。乍一看,参观者可能会把这归因于这样一个事实,即目前只有一小部分藏品向游客开放,而在古董晚期和中世纪早期的藏品中,只有最具内在价值的物品才能在格鲁吉亚西蒙·贾纳希亚博物馆和谢尔瓦·阿米拉纳什维利美术博物馆的宝库中向公众开放。虽然在格鲁吉亚收集叙利亚文物的信息很困难,但与在叙利亚寻找“伊比利亚人”证据的难度相比,这项任务似乎很简单。由于在内战开始之前,没有人为自己确定对叙利亚收藏的格鲁吉亚材料进行量化的任务,目前尚不清楚将来何时或是否有可能进行这样的研究。我们可以说明的是,今天在阿拉伯叙利亚共和国没有记录到格鲁吉亚的铭文或人工制品。另一方面,有大量的考古证据证明格鲁吉亚在土耳其哈塔伊地区的存在,当然,在1939年之前,这里是叙利亚的一个省。Djobadze对Antioch(现代Antakya)的腹地进行了广泛的调查,并进行了一系列的考古探索,最终证明了在semanda奥斯曼,在St. Symeon Stylites the Younger修道院和附近的其他地方,特别是在已知的地区,有格鲁吉亚僧侣的存在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信