A Bear on a Wall: Disruptive Agents of Space- and Place-Based Ethical Boundaries

Derek G. Ross, Brett Oppegaard, Russell Willerton, Y. Tang, Austin Pearson
{"title":"A Bear on a Wall: Disruptive Agents of Space- and Place-Based Ethical Boundaries","authors":"Derek G. Ross, Brett Oppegaard, Russell Willerton, Y. Tang, Austin Pearson","doi":"10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viral videos of human-animal interactions are prevalent among social-media sites. The comments sections of these videos are sites of debate over the ethics of place. In this study, we analyze comments on three viral videos to investigate three questions: Who has, or who creates, authority in construction of a space- or place-based ethic? In what ways are arguments about environmental ethics regarding space and place formed, and how do they emerge in social media spaces? What can we learn from an investigation of specific viral videos, including their associated comments, as they relate to place and space-based ethics? This study suggests interesting possibilities for the way ethics-related information moves, and for the ways we consider place and space in relation to ourselves and our world.","PeriodicalId":286504,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viral videos of human-animal interactions are prevalent among social-media sites. The comments sections of these videos are sites of debate over the ethics of place. In this study, we analyze comments on three viral videos to investigate three questions: Who has, or who creates, authority in construction of a space- or place-based ethic? In what ways are arguments about environmental ethics regarding space and place formed, and how do they emerge in social media spaces? What can we learn from an investigation of specific viral videos, including their associated comments, as they relate to place and space-based ethics? This study suggests interesting possibilities for the way ethics-related information moves, and for the ways we consider place and space in relation to ourselves and our world.
墙上的熊:基于空间和地点的道德界限的破坏性因素
人与动物互动的视频在社交媒体网站上很流行。这些视频的评论区是关于场所伦理的辩论场所。在这项研究中,我们分析了三个病毒视频的评论,以探讨三个问题:谁拥有或谁创造了基于空间或地点的伦理建构的权威?关于空间和地点的环境伦理的争论是如何形成的,它们是如何在社交媒体空间中出现的?我们可以从对特定病毒视频的调查中学到什么,包括与之相关的评论,因为它们与地点和空间伦理有关?这项研究提出了与伦理相关的信息移动方式的有趣可能性,以及我们考虑与我们自己和我们的世界有关的地点和空间的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信