Bounds for target tracking accuracy with probability of detection smaller than one

Y. Boers, H. Driessen
{"title":"Bounds for target tracking accuracy with probability of detection smaller than one","authors":"Y. Boers, H. Driessen","doi":"10.1109/ICIF.2007.4408004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently several new results for Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB's) in dynamical systems have been obtained. Several different approaches and approximations have been presented. For the general case of target tracking with a detection probability smaller than one and possibly in the presence of false measurements, two main approaches have been presented. One is the so called information reduction factor (IRF) approach and the other the enumeration (ENUM) approach, also referred to as conditioning approach. It has been shown that the ENUM approach leads to a strictly larger covariance matrix than the IRF approach, still being a lower bound of on the performance however. Thus, the ENUM approach provides a strictly tighter bound on the attainable performance. It has been conjectured that these bounds converge to one another in the limit or equivalently after an initial transition stage. In this paper we show, using some recent results on the so called modified Riccati (MR) equation and by means of counter examples, that this conjecture does not hold true in general. We also prove that it does hold true in the special case of deterministic target motion. Furthermore, we show that the detection probability has an influence on the limiting behaviors of the bounds. The various results are illustrated by means of representative examples.","PeriodicalId":298941,"journal":{"name":"2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2007.4408004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recently several new results for Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB's) in dynamical systems have been obtained. Several different approaches and approximations have been presented. For the general case of target tracking with a detection probability smaller than one and possibly in the presence of false measurements, two main approaches have been presented. One is the so called information reduction factor (IRF) approach and the other the enumeration (ENUM) approach, also referred to as conditioning approach. It has been shown that the ENUM approach leads to a strictly larger covariance matrix than the IRF approach, still being a lower bound of on the performance however. Thus, the ENUM approach provides a strictly tighter bound on the attainable performance. It has been conjectured that these bounds converge to one another in the limit or equivalently after an initial transition stage. In this paper we show, using some recent results on the so called modified Riccati (MR) equation and by means of counter examples, that this conjecture does not hold true in general. We also prove that it does hold true in the special case of deterministic target motion. Furthermore, we show that the detection probability has an influence on the limiting behaviors of the bounds. The various results are illustrated by means of representative examples.
检测概率小于1的目标跟踪精度边界
近年来,关于动力系统的Cramer-Rao下界(CRLB’s)得到了几个新的结果。提出了几种不同的方法和近似。对于检测概率小于1且可能存在错误测量的目标跟踪的一般情况,提出了两种主要的跟踪方法。一种是所谓的信息约简因子(IRF)方法,另一种是枚举(ENUM)方法,也称为条件反射方法。已经证明ENUM方法比IRF方法产生更大的协方差矩阵,但仍然是性能的下界。因此,ENUM方法对可实现的性能提供了严格的约束。据推测,这些边界在极限或在初始过渡阶段之后彼此收敛。在本文中,我们利用所谓的修正Riccati (MR)方程的一些最新结果并通过反例证明,这个猜想一般不成立。我们还证明了它在确定性目标运动的特殊情况下是成立的。进一步,我们证明了检测概率对边界的极限行为有影响。通过代表性实例说明了各种结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信