A Comparison of Psychological and Physiological Responses to Autogenic Training and Autogenic Feedback Training: The Response of Athletes New to Autogenic Training

Hideaki Takai, Osamitsu Saijo, Y. Kusumoto
{"title":"A Comparison of Psychological and Physiological Responses to Autogenic Training and Autogenic Feedback Training: The Response of Athletes New to Autogenic Training","authors":"Hideaki Takai, Osamitsu Saijo, Y. Kusumoto","doi":"10.5432/IJSHS.IJSHS20090016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined how athletes new to autogenic training (AT) respond to autogenic feedback training (AFT) by comparing their psychological and physiological responses to AT and AFT. It focused on warmth sensation training (WST), a necessary component of AT. The two experimental conditions-the AT condition and AFT condition-were compared using psychological and physiological indices. Psychological indices included the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Brief Form, as well as participants' subjective ratings regarding motivation for WST and sensation of warmth. Physiological indices were skin temperature, respiration rate, and the electrocardiogram R-R interval. A Lorenz plot was constructed from the R-R interval to visualize the cardiac autonomic nervous activity. It was found that the POMS Brief Form value for vigor decreased after training under the AT condition, but it did not change under the AFT condition. The subjective evaluation score regarding motivation for WST was higher under the AFT condition than the AT condition. The subjective evaluation score regarding warmth sensation was higher under the AT condition than the AFT condition. Sympathetic nerve activity was more inhibited during and after training under the AT condition; in the AFT condition, it remained constant. Therefore, for athletes new to AT, AFT neither leads to greater relaxation nor a greater sensation of warmth compared to AT; nonetheless, AFT effectively increases athletes' motivation for AT.","PeriodicalId":341890,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5432/IJSHS.IJSHS20090016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined how athletes new to autogenic training (AT) respond to autogenic feedback training (AFT) by comparing their psychological and physiological responses to AT and AFT. It focused on warmth sensation training (WST), a necessary component of AT. The two experimental conditions-the AT condition and AFT condition-were compared using psychological and physiological indices. Psychological indices included the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Brief Form, as well as participants' subjective ratings regarding motivation for WST and sensation of warmth. Physiological indices were skin temperature, respiration rate, and the electrocardiogram R-R interval. A Lorenz plot was constructed from the R-R interval to visualize the cardiac autonomic nervous activity. It was found that the POMS Brief Form value for vigor decreased after training under the AT condition, but it did not change under the AFT condition. The subjective evaluation score regarding motivation for WST was higher under the AFT condition than the AT condition. The subjective evaluation score regarding warmth sensation was higher under the AT condition than the AFT condition. Sympathetic nerve activity was more inhibited during and after training under the AT condition; in the AFT condition, it remained constant. Therefore, for athletes new to AT, AFT neither leads to greater relaxation nor a greater sensation of warmth compared to AT; nonetheless, AFT effectively increases athletes' motivation for AT.
对自体训练和自体反馈训练的心理和生理反应的比较:新运动员对自体训练的反应
本研究通过比较初学自源性训练(AT)和自源性反馈训练(AFT)的心理和生理反应,探讨了初学自源性训练(AT)的运动员对自源性反馈训练(AFT)的反应,重点研究了自源性反馈训练的必要组成部分——热感觉训练(WST)。采用心理和生理指标对AT和AFT两种实验条件进行了比较。心理指标包括情绪状态概要表(POMS),以及参与者对WST动机和温暖感觉的主观评价。生理指标为皮肤温度、呼吸速率、心电图R-R间期。利用R-R间期构建洛伦兹图,可视化心脏自主神经活动。结果发现,在AT条件下,训练后的POMS简表活力值有所下降,而在AFT条件下没有变化。实验条件下的主观评价得分高于实验条件下的主观评价得分。热感觉主观评价得分在AT条件下高于AFT条件。AT条件下交感神经活动在训练期间和训练后受到更大的抑制;在AFT条件下,它保持不变。因此,对于刚接触AT的运动员来说,与AT相比,AFT既没有带来更大的放松,也没有带来更大的温暖感;尽管如此,AFT有效地增加了运动员进行AT的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信