{"title":"Performance Measurement Tools for Total Quality Management in Application to Healthcare Environment: A Qualitative Systematic Review","authors":"Dana Grossu, H. Kalkis","doi":"10.22364/jemr.8.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of rapidly changing business environment, total quality management (TQM) has become a common approach for overall organisational management with the strong emphasis on continuously improving the quality of processes and its outcomes. Hospitals and other healthcare organisations across the globe have been progressively implementing TQM to reduce costs, improve efficiency and provide high quality patient care. Moreover, TQM has become an important part of healthcare organisations’ competitive strategy in quality for healthcare delivery. The aim of the research is to identify the most commonly used measurement tools for TQM in application to healthcare environment using comprehensive review of TQM literature. Guided data search and screening process are conducted using qualitative systematic review, and the results identified and interpreted using a quantitative content analysis method of the research. The search of literature was conducted using 4 academic online databases – EBSCO, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and WEB of SCIENCE. A total of 234 articles were initially searched, full texts of 32 articles were assessed, and 6 articles that met the inclusion criteria were finally included in the research. As the result of systematic article review, the following information has been synthesised: Benchmarking and ISO Standards, Competitive Benchmarking, Management and Employee Self-Developed Questionnaire, Customer Satisfaction Survey, Quality Award Self-Assessment.","PeriodicalId":162320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Management Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/jemr.8.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In the context of rapidly changing business environment, total quality management (TQM) has become a common approach for overall organisational management with the strong emphasis on continuously improving the quality of processes and its outcomes. Hospitals and other healthcare organisations across the globe have been progressively implementing TQM to reduce costs, improve efficiency and provide high quality patient care. Moreover, TQM has become an important part of healthcare organisations’ competitive strategy in quality for healthcare delivery. The aim of the research is to identify the most commonly used measurement tools for TQM in application to healthcare environment using comprehensive review of TQM literature. Guided data search and screening process are conducted using qualitative systematic review, and the results identified and interpreted using a quantitative content analysis method of the research. The search of literature was conducted using 4 academic online databases – EBSCO, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and WEB of SCIENCE. A total of 234 articles were initially searched, full texts of 32 articles were assessed, and 6 articles that met the inclusion criteria were finally included in the research. As the result of systematic article review, the following information has been synthesised: Benchmarking and ISO Standards, Competitive Benchmarking, Management and Employee Self-Developed Questionnaire, Customer Satisfaction Survey, Quality Award Self-Assessment.
在快速变化的商业环境中,全面质量管理(TQM)已成为组织整体管理的通用方法,强调持续改进过程及其结果的质量。全球各地的医院和其他医疗机构都在逐步实施TQM,以降低成本、提高效率并提供高质量的患者护理。此外,全面质量管理已成为医疗机构在医疗服务质量方面的竞争战略的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是通过对全面质量管理文献的全面回顾,确定在医疗保健环境中应用全面质量管理最常用的测量工具。指导数据搜索和筛选过程采用定性系统评价,并使用定量内容分析方法对研究结果进行识别和解释。文献检索使用EBSCO、SCOPUS、MEDLINE和WEB of SCIENCE 4个学术在线数据库。初步检索了234篇文献,评估了32篇文献的全文,最终将符合纳入标准的6篇文献纳入研究。通过系统的文章评审,我们综合了以下信息:基准和ISO标准、竞争基准、管理和员工自编问卷、客户满意度调查、质量奖自我评估。