Effects of sagebrush restoration on plant and bird communities in Grand Teton National Park

A. Chalfoun, T. N. Johnson
{"title":"Effects of sagebrush restoration on plant and bird communities in Grand Teton National Park","authors":"A. Chalfoun, T. N. Johnson","doi":"10.13001/UWNPSRC.2018.5651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately half of sagebrush steppe range-wide has been converted to non-native grasslands, which has contributed to population declines of sagebrush-associated songbirds.  Removal of non-native grasses and restoration treatments are time-, resource- and energy-intensive, but could lead to the return of functional habitat for sagebrush wildlife. The extent to which restoration efforts repair the structure and functionality of sagebrush steppe for different types of wildlife, however, remains largely untested. To determine breeding songbird community responses to sagebrush restoration treatments, we are conducting a longitudinal study with sampling every 5 years within restoration units at different stages of restoration in the Kelly Hayfields restoration area in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Thus far, in 2013 and 2018 we compared bird and plant communities in unrestored (largely smooth brome [Bromus inermis]) units to those in various stages of restoration treatments, and to areas of native sagebrush. The sagebrush plots will serve as desired comparators for the endpoints of restoration efforts. The in-progress and recently replanted units were either dominated by bare ground (following herbicidal application) or native forbs with very little shrub cover (< 0.1%).  Native sagebrush units were dominated by shrubs and native bunchgrasses.  Bird community composition was distinct among the different unit types.  Abundance of grassland birds was highest in unrestored units, whereas the abundance of shrubland birds was highest in native sagebrush and positively associated with shrub cover.  There were very few detections of birds in recently re-seeded units. Restored areas may initially provide little breeding bird habitat, especially prior to the establishment of native bunch grasses and a mature shrub layer. Plant and bird sampling efforts will continue every five years to document how plant and bird assemblages shift over time in response to restoration efforts. \n  \nFeatured photo by Matt Lavin on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/fh7UJz","PeriodicalId":217302,"journal":{"name":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/UWNPSRC.2018.5651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately half of sagebrush steppe range-wide has been converted to non-native grasslands, which has contributed to population declines of sagebrush-associated songbirds.  Removal of non-native grasses and restoration treatments are time-, resource- and energy-intensive, but could lead to the return of functional habitat for sagebrush wildlife. The extent to which restoration efforts repair the structure and functionality of sagebrush steppe for different types of wildlife, however, remains largely untested. To determine breeding songbird community responses to sagebrush restoration treatments, we are conducting a longitudinal study with sampling every 5 years within restoration units at different stages of restoration in the Kelly Hayfields restoration area in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Thus far, in 2013 and 2018 we compared bird and plant communities in unrestored (largely smooth brome [Bromus inermis]) units to those in various stages of restoration treatments, and to areas of native sagebrush. The sagebrush plots will serve as desired comparators for the endpoints of restoration efforts. The in-progress and recently replanted units were either dominated by bare ground (following herbicidal application) or native forbs with very little shrub cover (< 0.1%).  Native sagebrush units were dominated by shrubs and native bunchgrasses.  Bird community composition was distinct among the different unit types.  Abundance of grassland birds was highest in unrestored units, whereas the abundance of shrubland birds was highest in native sagebrush and positively associated with shrub cover.  There were very few detections of birds in recently re-seeded units. Restored areas may initially provide little breeding bird habitat, especially prior to the establishment of native bunch grasses and a mature shrub layer. Plant and bird sampling efforts will continue every five years to document how plant and bird assemblages shift over time in response to restoration efforts.   Featured photo by Matt Lavin on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/fh7UJz
山艾树恢复对大提顿国家公园植物和鸟类群落的影响
大约一半的山艾草草原已经转变为非原生草原,这导致了山艾草相关鸣禽的数量下降。去除非原生草和恢复处理是时间、资源和能源密集型的,但可以导致山艾属野生动物功能栖息地的回归。然而,恢复工作在多大程度上修复了不同类型野生动物的山艾草草原的结构和功能,仍然在很大程度上未经测试。为了确定繁殖鸣禽群落对山艾树恢复处理的反应,我们在怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的凯利海菲尔德恢复区进行了一项纵向研究,每5年在恢复的不同阶段对恢复单元进行采样。到目前为止,在2013年和2018年,我们将未恢复的(主要是光滑的雀麦[Bromus inermis])单元的鸟类和植物群落与处于不同恢复处理阶段的鸟类和植物群落以及原生山艾树区域进行了比较。山艾树样地将作为恢复工作终点的理想比较物。正在进行和最近补种的单位要么以裸地(除草后)为主,要么以灌木覆盖很少(< 0.1%)的原生牧草为主。原生山艾属植物以灌木和原生束草为主。不同单元类型的鸟类群落组成差异较大。草地鸟类的丰度在未恢复单元中最高,而灌丛鸟类的丰度在原生荞属植物中最高,且与灌木盖度呈正相关。在最近重新播种的单位中很少发现鸟类。恢复区最初可能提供很少的繁殖鸟类栖息地,特别是在原生束草和成熟灌木层建立之前。植物和鸟类的采样工作将每五年继续进行,以记录植物和鸟类的组合如何随着时间的推移而变化,以响应恢复工作。Flickr上的特色照片由Matt Lavin提供。https://flic.kr/p/fh7UJz
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信