EU Carbon Border Adjustments for Imported Products and WTO Law

J. Englisch, Tatiana Falcão
{"title":"EU Carbon Border Adjustments for Imported Products and WTO Law","authors":"J. Englisch, Tatiana Falcão","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3863038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, the European Commission announced its intention to table a legislative proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), as part of a wider package of laws aimed at implementing the EU Green Deal. It furthermore stated that it would explore various options, such as a so-called “carbon tax” on selected products, a new carbon customs duty, or the extension of the EU ETS to imports. Apart from political and technical challengens, it is generally acknowledged that the main legal hurdle that a CBAM would have to take is to ensure compatibility with the world trade law of the WTO. Against this background, the present policy paper endeavours to explore whether, and if so how, the various CBAM design options that were under consideration could be reconciled with WTO law requirements as developed by panels and the Appellate Body. Different from other publications, we directly compare different CBAM instruments as to their WTO compatiblity, and we moreover also propose certain design modifications for individual instruments so as to strike a better balance with the objective of addressing carbon leakage. At the same time, the paper offers a comprehensive survey of scholarly writings on the topic and potentially relevant WTO jurisprudence. We have furthermore included a small section discussing international political economics. Due to its comprehensive nature, the findings of the paper are also relevant for the actual CBAM proposal of the Commission (published July 14, 2021), and for other jurisdictions contemplating similar measures. This paper has been accepted for publication in the Environmental Law Reporter.","PeriodicalId":122765,"journal":{"name":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","volume":"88 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3863038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2020, the European Commission announced its intention to table a legislative proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), as part of a wider package of laws aimed at implementing the EU Green Deal. It furthermore stated that it would explore various options, such as a so-called “carbon tax” on selected products, a new carbon customs duty, or the extension of the EU ETS to imports. Apart from political and technical challengens, it is generally acknowledged that the main legal hurdle that a CBAM would have to take is to ensure compatibility with the world trade law of the WTO. Against this background, the present policy paper endeavours to explore whether, and if so how, the various CBAM design options that were under consideration could be reconciled with WTO law requirements as developed by panels and the Appellate Body. Different from other publications, we directly compare different CBAM instruments as to their WTO compatiblity, and we moreover also propose certain design modifications for individual instruments so as to strike a better balance with the objective of addressing carbon leakage. At the same time, the paper offers a comprehensive survey of scholarly writings on the topic and potentially relevant WTO jurisprudence. We have furthermore included a small section discussing international political economics. Due to its comprehensive nature, the findings of the paper are also relevant for the actual CBAM proposal of the Commission (published July 14, 2021), and for other jurisdictions contemplating similar measures. This paper has been accepted for publication in the Environmental Law Reporter.
欧盟进口产品碳边界调整与WTO法律
2020年,欧盟委员会宣布打算提出一项关于碳边界调整机制(CBAM)的立法提案,作为旨在实施《欧盟绿色协议》的更广泛的一揽子法律的一部分。欧盟进一步表示,将探索各种选择,例如对选定产品征收所谓的“碳税”,征收新的碳关税,或将欧盟碳排放交易体系扩展到进口产品。除了政治和技术上的挑战外,人们普遍认为,CBAM必须克服的主要法律障碍是确保与世界贸易组织的世界贸易法相一致。在此背景下,本政策文件努力探讨正在审议的各种CBAM设计方案是否可以与专家组和上诉机构制定的世贸组织法律要求相协调,如果可以,如何协调。与其他出版物不同的是,我们直接比较了不同的CBAM仪器与WTO的兼容性,并且我们还对个别仪器提出了某些设计修改,以便更好地平衡解决碳泄漏的目标。同时,本文提供了一个全面的学术著作的主题和潜在相关的WTO法学的调查。我们还增加了一小部分讨论国际政治经济学。由于其全面性,该论文的研究结果也适用于委员会的实际CBAM提案(于2021年7月14日发布),以及考虑采取类似措施的其他司法管辖区。这篇论文已被《环境法报道》接受发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信