Design to improve the freshman admissions process

Maria Barthelson, Issam Boumlic, Ummer Shamma
{"title":"Design to improve the freshman admissions process","authors":"Maria Barthelson, Issam Boumlic, Ummer Shamma","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universities are under increasing pressure to decrease operation costs to reduce increasing tuition and to maintain or improve enrollment rates. These two conflicting pressures come to a head with the University Admissions Department, which must meet target enrollment rates within their budget. The admissions department at George Mason University must currently hire outside application readers in order for admissions counselors to complete all fundamental admissions tasks by their deadlines. The hours worked by outside readers accounts for approximately 8% of hours worked by the freshman admissions staff during the reading season. One way of reducing labor costs is by reducing or reorganizing the staff to be comprised of fewer high salary employees. Lower wage employees are less skilled and are limited to performing specific tasks. The goal of this paper is to design the process and analyze the feasibility of reorganizing the admissions staff. To lower system costs and make the process feasible, reorganization must occur without decreasing enrollment rates or increasing the time students wait for service. The design alternatives tested were: (1) the current process, (2) Decreasing the number of counselors and increasing the number of outside readers, (3) Removing outside readers, adding fellows, and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors. and (4) Keeping outside readers and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors. The utility of each alternative from first to last are: 0, 0.290, 2, and 0.376. Alternative 3, removing outside readers, adding fellows, and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors, is recommended, as it shows the greatest improvement of the admissions process out of the alternatives.","PeriodicalId":441073,"journal":{"name":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Universities are under increasing pressure to decrease operation costs to reduce increasing tuition and to maintain or improve enrollment rates. These two conflicting pressures come to a head with the University Admissions Department, which must meet target enrollment rates within their budget. The admissions department at George Mason University must currently hire outside application readers in order for admissions counselors to complete all fundamental admissions tasks by their deadlines. The hours worked by outside readers accounts for approximately 8% of hours worked by the freshman admissions staff during the reading season. One way of reducing labor costs is by reducing or reorganizing the staff to be comprised of fewer high salary employees. Lower wage employees are less skilled and are limited to performing specific tasks. The goal of this paper is to design the process and analyze the feasibility of reorganizing the admissions staff. To lower system costs and make the process feasible, reorganization must occur without decreasing enrollment rates or increasing the time students wait for service. The design alternatives tested were: (1) the current process, (2) Decreasing the number of counselors and increasing the number of outside readers, (3) Removing outside readers, adding fellows, and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors. and (4) Keeping outside readers and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors. The utility of each alternative from first to last are: 0, 0.290, 2, and 0.376. Alternative 3, removing outside readers, adding fellows, and specializing tasks between fellows and counselors, is recommended, as it shows the greatest improvement of the admissions process out of the alternatives.
旨在改善新生入学过程
大学面临着越来越大的压力,需要降低运营成本,以降低不断上涨的学费,保持或提高入学率。这两种相互冲突的压力在大学招生部门达到顶峰,他们必须在预算范围内达到目标入学率。乔治梅森大学(George Mason University)的招生部门目前必须聘请外部申请阅卷员,以便招生顾问在截止日期前完成所有基本的招生任务。在阅读季,外部读者的工作时间约占新生招生工作人员工作时间的8%。减少劳动力成本的一种方法是减少或重组员工,以减少高薪员工。工资较低的员工技能较差,只能完成特定的任务。本文的目的是设计招生人员重组的流程并分析其可行性。为了降低系统成本并使流程可行,重组必须在不降低入学率或增加学生等待服务时间的情况下进行。测试的设计备选方案为:(1)当前流程,(2)减少咨询师的数量并增加外部读者的数量,(3)取消外部读者,增加研究员,以及研究员和咨询师之间的专业任务。(4)保持外部读者和研究员和顾问之间的专业任务。每个备选方案的效用从上到下依次为:0、0.290、2和0.376。建议选择3,取消外部阅读者,增加研究员,以及研究员和顾问之间的专门任务,因为它显示了在替代方案中招生过程的最大改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信