“Let us, therefore, stimulate one another”: John Fothergill’s Letters and the Notion of Value and Professionalism

Marcel Hartwig
{"title":"“Let us, therefore, stimulate one another”: John Fothergill’s Letters and the Notion of Value and Professionalism","authors":"Marcel Hartwig","doi":"10.54664/zcxr1359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around the middle of the eighteenth century, the London Quaker John Fothergill, M.D., established himself as an essential node in a transatlantic epistolary network. Via letter writing, Fothergill closed book deals, forwarded anatomical drawings, and exchanged botanical seeds and investment schemes that eventually culminated in the financial politics of the first North American hospital, the Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia. He also provided books for the Hospital’s first Medical Library and made suggestions for people to be employed and teaching tools to be used in the first anatomical lectures in Philadelphia. Fothergill’s network sheds much needed light on transatlantic trade and the circulation and commercialization of medical print media in North America’s first regulated medical institutions. The many letters that he wrote provide insights into practices of knowledge production in these institutions. In this article, Fothergill’s epistolary web is represented as a semi-institutionalized network showing colonial medical practice to have been linked to semi-institutionalized spaces that were themselves connected to custodians of knowledge but also functioned as social networks. I argue that such networks were user-based and community-driven, and that they relied on a semi-authoritarian dispersion of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":124585,"journal":{"name":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/zcxr1359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around the middle of the eighteenth century, the London Quaker John Fothergill, M.D., established himself as an essential node in a transatlantic epistolary network. Via letter writing, Fothergill closed book deals, forwarded anatomical drawings, and exchanged botanical seeds and investment schemes that eventually culminated in the financial politics of the first North American hospital, the Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia. He also provided books for the Hospital’s first Medical Library and made suggestions for people to be employed and teaching tools to be used in the first anatomical lectures in Philadelphia. Fothergill’s network sheds much needed light on transatlantic trade and the circulation and commercialization of medical print media in North America’s first regulated medical institutions. The many letters that he wrote provide insights into practices of knowledge production in these institutions. In this article, Fothergill’s epistolary web is represented as a semi-institutionalized network showing colonial medical practice to have been linked to semi-institutionalized spaces that were themselves connected to custodians of knowledge but also functioned as social networks. I argue that such networks were user-based and community-driven, and that they relied on a semi-authoritarian dispersion of knowledge.
“因此,让我们彼此激励”:约翰·福瑟吉尔的《信件与价值和专业主义的概念》
大约在18世纪中叶,伦敦贵格会教徒约翰·福瑟吉尔(John Fothergill)博士确立了自己在跨大西洋书信网络中的重要节点地位。通过写信,福瑟吉尔完成了图书交易,转发了解剖图纸,交换了植物种子和投资计划,最终促成了北美第一家医院——费城的宾夕法尼亚医院的财务政治。他还为医院的第一个医学图书馆提供了书籍,并为费城第一次解剖学讲座的用人和教学工具提出了建议。Fothergill的网络为跨大西洋贸易以及北美首批受监管的医疗机构中医疗印刷媒体的流通和商业化提供了急需的信息。他写的许多信件提供了对这些机构中知识生产实践的见解。在这篇文章中,Fothergill的书信体网络被表示为一个半制度化的网络,显示了殖民地医疗实践与半制度化的空间相关联,这些空间本身与知识的保管人相连,但也具有社会网络的功能。我认为这样的网络是基于用户和社区驱动的,它们依赖于半专制的知识分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信