DEPTH ASSESSMENT USING CONTRALATERAL OBLIQUE VIEW DURING CERVICAL INTERLAMINAR EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS

E. Helm
{"title":"DEPTH ASSESSMENT USING CONTRALATERAL OBLIQUE VIEW DURING CERVICAL INTERLAMINAR EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS","authors":"E. Helm","doi":"10.36076/PMCR.2019/3/115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent literature has demonstrated\nthat the contralateral oblique (CLO) view\nprovides a more reliable angle in determining\nneedle depth when compared to the lateral view\nduring cervical interlaminar injections. Despite\nthe utilization of CLO safety views, contrast patterns,\nand loss-of-resistance techniques, inherent\nrisk of injury still remains. Additional safety\nmeasures must be assessed to provide clinicians\nwith further safeguards to prevent procedural\ncomplications.\nObjective: The purpose of our study is to provide\na reliable method of gauging needle depth\ninsertion during cervical interlaminar injections\nby comparing the distance from the skin to the\nepidural space when measured on magnetic\nresonance imaging (MRI) and when measured\nintraoperatively.\nMethods: The study sample included 45 patients\nwith cervical radiculopathy or cervical spinal stenosis.\nThe distance from the skin to the epidural\nspace was measured on cervical spine MRI and\nwith the spinal needle intraoperatively. Primary\nanalysis included the correlation between these\ndistances, and whether differences in depth were\ninfluenced by injection level, needle tip location,\nor body mass index (BMI).\nResults: A significant correlation (r = .975, P <\n.001) with an average difference of .03 mm (standard\ndeviation, 2.99 mm) was found between MRI\nand procedural measurements. Neither injection\nlevel nor BMI had a significant influence on the\ndifference in depth.\nConclusion: When combined with traditional safety\ntechniques, obtaining preprocedural MRI depth\nmeasurements can provide a reliable method in\npredicting the true needle depth to safely enter the\nepidural space. Because the majority of patients\nundergoing interlaminar cervical epidural steroid\ninjections will have already obtained MRI, measuring\nthe distance preprocedurally is a simple\nand practical method for physicians to implement.\nKey words: Cervical, fluoroscopy, radiculopathy,\ninjection, contra-lateral oblique, contrast,\nsafety, complications, spinal stenosis, radiation,\ninterlaminar","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/PMCR.2019/3/115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent literature has demonstrated that the contralateral oblique (CLO) view provides a more reliable angle in determining needle depth when compared to the lateral view during cervical interlaminar injections. Despite the utilization of CLO safety views, contrast patterns, and loss-of-resistance techniques, inherent risk of injury still remains. Additional safety measures must be assessed to provide clinicians with further safeguards to prevent procedural complications. Objective: The purpose of our study is to provide a reliable method of gauging needle depth insertion during cervical interlaminar injections by comparing the distance from the skin to the epidural space when measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and when measured intraoperatively. Methods: The study sample included 45 patients with cervical radiculopathy or cervical spinal stenosis. The distance from the skin to the epidural space was measured on cervical spine MRI and with the spinal needle intraoperatively. Primary analysis included the correlation between these distances, and whether differences in depth were influenced by injection level, needle tip location, or body mass index (BMI). Results: A significant correlation (r = .975, P < .001) with an average difference of .03 mm (standard deviation, 2.99 mm) was found between MRI and procedural measurements. Neither injection level nor BMI had a significant influence on the difference in depth. Conclusion: When combined with traditional safety techniques, obtaining preprocedural MRI depth measurements can provide a reliable method in predicting the true needle depth to safely enter the epidural space. Because the majority of patients undergoing interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections will have already obtained MRI, measuring the distance preprocedurally is a simple and practical method for physicians to implement. Key words: Cervical, fluoroscopy, radiculopathy, injection, contra-lateral oblique, contrast, safety, complications, spinal stenosis, radiation, interlaminar
硬膜外类固醇注射时对侧斜位位深度评估
背景:最近的文献表明,在颈椎椎板间注射时,与侧位相比,对侧斜位(CLO)视图在确定针深方面提供了更可靠的角度。尽管采用了CLO安全视角、对比模式和阻力丧失技术,但损伤的内在风险仍然存在。必须评估额外的安全措施,为临床医生提供进一步的保障措施,以防止手术并发症。目的:本研究的目的是通过比较磁共振成像(MRI)和术中测量时皮肤到硬膜外间隙的距离,提供可靠的方法来测量颈椎椎板间注射时针头的深度。方法:选取45例颈椎病或颈椎管狭窄患者作为研究对象。在颈椎MRI和术中用脊髓针测量皮肤到硬膜外间隙的距离。主要分析包括这些距离之间的相关性,以及深度差异是否受注射水平、针尖位置或体重指数(BMI)的影响。结果:mri与常规测量结果有显著相关性(r = 0.975, P < 0.001),平均差异为0.03 mm(标准偏差2.99 mm)。注射水平和BMI对深度差异均无显著影响。结论:与传统的安全技术相结合,术前MRI深度测量可提供可靠的方法来预测针的真实深度,以安全进入硬膜外腔。由于大多数接受宫颈层间硬膜外类固醇注射的患者都已经进行了MRI检查,因此术前测量距离对医生来说是一种简单实用的方法。关键词:颈椎,透视,神经根病,注射,对侧斜位,对比,安全性,并发症,椎管狭窄,放射,椎间层
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信