Experimental Investigation of Evaporator and Condenser Placement Configuration for Oscillating Heat Pipes

Osvaldo Castro, Kieran Wolk, Benjamin A. Furst, E. Sunada, Scott Roberts, T. Daimaru, Jim Kuo, J. Bellardo
{"title":"Experimental Investigation of Evaporator and Condenser Placement Configuration for Oscillating Heat Pipes","authors":"Osvaldo Castro, Kieran Wolk, Benjamin A. Furst, E. Sunada, Scott Roberts, T. Daimaru, Jim Kuo, J. Bellardo","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-94326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, we explore two different Oscillating Heat Pipe (OHP) evaporator-condenser placement configurations, and investigate and quantify the effects on thermal performance. The proposed study focuses on two different OHP evaporator-condenser configurations with a change in adiabatic length.\n One of the challenges in OHP literature is the variety of experiment setups, (e.g. varying condenser, evaporator, and adiabatic lengths, heat input) which makes it difficult to compare results directly. To quantitatively compare thermal performance, a (or a set of) standardized metric(s) must be used. Therefore, we define a standardizing metric to quantify OHP’s ability to conduct heat that can be used across multiple experiments and setups.\n This study was conducted on an additively manufactured flat-plate AlSi10Mg OHP which has a channel diameter of 1.4 mm, 22 turns, and a plate size of 200 mm × 90 mm × 4 mm. Both the evaporator and condenser are rectangles with contact areas of 46 mm by 78 mm. The OHP was charged with R134a with a 45% filling ratio. In these tests, the location of the evaporator was fixed, while the placement of the condenser is varied such that the adiabatic length ranged between 4 mm to 94 mm. The condenser temperature was maintained between 10°C to 25°C and the heat input ranged between 20W to 50W.\n The results showed that a reduction in adiabatic length increased the thermal conductivity. To quantify the thermal performance, the thermal conductivities of an empty and charged OHP were determined for each placement configuration, then a thermal conductivity ratio of charged and empty OHP can be determined to quantify the improved performance. For an adiabatic length of 4 mm, we observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 40 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP. It was also observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 9 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP for an adiabatic length of 94 mm. We conclude that the area outside the evaporator-condenser that is neither heated nor cooled, called the reservoir, significantly influenced the thermal performance. The OHP with a shorter adiabatic length increased the reservoir in the condenser region which showed higher thermal performance. In this placement configuration, the reservoir essentially acted as an extension of the condenser. This is a favorable condition where the subcooled liquid slugs re-enter the condenser section which affects heat transfer drastically. Thus, the placement of the evaporator-condenser will influence OHP performance due to the reservoir and warrants future work.","PeriodicalId":292222,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-94326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we explore two different Oscillating Heat Pipe (OHP) evaporator-condenser placement configurations, and investigate and quantify the effects on thermal performance. The proposed study focuses on two different OHP evaporator-condenser configurations with a change in adiabatic length. One of the challenges in OHP literature is the variety of experiment setups, (e.g. varying condenser, evaporator, and adiabatic lengths, heat input) which makes it difficult to compare results directly. To quantitatively compare thermal performance, a (or a set of) standardized metric(s) must be used. Therefore, we define a standardizing metric to quantify OHP’s ability to conduct heat that can be used across multiple experiments and setups. This study was conducted on an additively manufactured flat-plate AlSi10Mg OHP which has a channel diameter of 1.4 mm, 22 turns, and a plate size of 200 mm × 90 mm × 4 mm. Both the evaporator and condenser are rectangles with contact areas of 46 mm by 78 mm. The OHP was charged with R134a with a 45% filling ratio. In these tests, the location of the evaporator was fixed, while the placement of the condenser is varied such that the adiabatic length ranged between 4 mm to 94 mm. The condenser temperature was maintained between 10°C to 25°C and the heat input ranged between 20W to 50W. The results showed that a reduction in adiabatic length increased the thermal conductivity. To quantify the thermal performance, the thermal conductivities of an empty and charged OHP were determined for each placement configuration, then a thermal conductivity ratio of charged and empty OHP can be determined to quantify the improved performance. For an adiabatic length of 4 mm, we observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 40 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP. It was also observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 9 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP for an adiabatic length of 94 mm. We conclude that the area outside the evaporator-condenser that is neither heated nor cooled, called the reservoir, significantly influenced the thermal performance. The OHP with a shorter adiabatic length increased the reservoir in the condenser region which showed higher thermal performance. In this placement configuration, the reservoir essentially acted as an extension of the condenser. This is a favorable condition where the subcooled liquid slugs re-enter the condenser section which affects heat transfer drastically. Thus, the placement of the evaporator-condenser will influence OHP performance due to the reservoir and warrants future work.
振荡热管蒸发器和冷凝器布置形式的实验研究
在这项工作中,我们探索了两种不同的振荡热管(OHP)蒸发器-冷凝器放置配置,并调查和量化对热性能的影响。研究了两种不同绝热长度的OHP蒸发器-冷凝器配置。OHP文献中的挑战之一是实验设置的多样性(例如,不同的冷凝器,蒸发器和绝热长度,热量输入),这使得难以直接比较结果。为了定量地比较热性能,必须使用一个(或一组)标准化度量。因此,我们定义了一个标准化的指标来量化OHP的传导能力,可以在多个实验和设置中使用。本研究采用增材制造的AlSi10Mg OHP平板,通道直径为1.4 mm,匝数为22,板尺寸为200mm × 90mm × 4mm。蒸发器和冷凝器均为矩形,接触面积为46mm × 78mm。OHP用R134a充注,充注率为45%。在这些试验中,蒸发器的位置是固定的,而冷凝器的位置是不同的,因此绝热长度在4毫米到94毫米之间。冷凝器温度保持在10℃~ 25℃之间,热输入在20W ~ 50W之间。结果表明,绝热长度的减小增加了导热系数。为了量化热性能,我们测定了空OHP和带电OHP在每种放置配置下的导热系数,然后测定了带电OHP和空OHP的导热系数比,从而量化了性能的改善。对于4毫米的绝热长度,我们观察到OHP的导热能力是空OHP的40倍。研究还发现,与绝热长度为94 mm的空OHP相比,OHP的导热能力提高了9倍。我们得出的结论是,蒸发器-冷凝器外既不加热也不冷却的区域,称为蓄热区,对热性能有显著影响。绝热长度较短的OHP增加了冷凝器区域的蓄热量,表现出较高的热性能。在这种布置配置中,蓄热器基本上充当了冷凝器的延伸。这是过冷液段重新进入冷凝器段的有利条件,对传热影响很大。因此,由于储层的存在,蒸发器-冷凝器的位置将影响OHP的性能,因此需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信