Understanding citizen data practices from a feminist perspective

A. Fotopoulou
{"title":"Understanding citizen data practices from a feminist perspective","authors":"A. Fotopoulou","doi":"10.4324/9781351247375-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces the relevance of practice theory for understanding datafication from a feminist perspective. The first section shows how the practice paradigm, as developed in the social sciences and in media studies, can be applied in the study of data practices. Here it is argued that the notion of data practice incorporates a range of practices that may not be deemed or intended to be explicitly political, and thus allows us to analyse data politics and power relations in seemingly mundane, everyday settings. The chapter then introduces how the notion of ‘care’, as developed in feminist science and technology studies (de la Bellacasa, 2011), can be a productive analytical and critical approach when scrutinizing the manifestation of power relations in data practices. Approaching data power in everyday data practices as ‘matters of care’ allows us to account for their affective, embodied, and material elements, including the habitually devalued human labour of data users, activists, producers, consumers, and citizens. Outlining briefly justice (Dencik et al., 2016; Taylor 2017) and ethics approaches to data power, it is suggested that the notion of care inserts particularity and empathy in social justice frameworks. In this way the chapter maps a theoretical roadmap of feminist data studies and practice theory, which is focused on materiality and embodiment and is committed to unsettling the power relation of race, class, gender, and ability in datafied worlds.","PeriodicalId":103519,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Media and Practice","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Media and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351247375-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This chapter traces the relevance of practice theory for understanding datafication from a feminist perspective. The first section shows how the practice paradigm, as developed in the social sciences and in media studies, can be applied in the study of data practices. Here it is argued that the notion of data practice incorporates a range of practices that may not be deemed or intended to be explicitly political, and thus allows us to analyse data politics and power relations in seemingly mundane, everyday settings. The chapter then introduces how the notion of ‘care’, as developed in feminist science and technology studies (de la Bellacasa, 2011), can be a productive analytical and critical approach when scrutinizing the manifestation of power relations in data practices. Approaching data power in everyday data practices as ‘matters of care’ allows us to account for their affective, embodied, and material elements, including the habitually devalued human labour of data users, activists, producers, consumers, and citizens. Outlining briefly justice (Dencik et al., 2016; Taylor 2017) and ethics approaches to data power, it is suggested that the notion of care inserts particularity and empathy in social justice frameworks. In this way the chapter maps a theoretical roadmap of feminist data studies and practice theory, which is focused on materiality and embodiment and is committed to unsettling the power relation of race, class, gender, and ability in datafied worlds.
从女权主义的角度理解公民数据实践
本章追溯了实践理论与从女性主义角度理解数据化的相关性。第一部分展示了在社会科学和媒体研究中发展起来的实践范式如何应用于数据实践的研究。本文认为,数据实践的概念包含了一系列可能不被视为或意图明确的政治实践,从而使我们能够在看似平凡的日常环境中分析数据政治和权力关系。然后,本章介绍了在女权主义科学和技术研究中发展起来的“关怀”概念(de la Bellacasa, 2011)如何在审查数据实践中权力关系的表现时成为一种富有成效的分析和批判方法。将日常数据实践中的数据权力视为“关注事项”,使我们能够解释其情感,具体和物质因素,包括习惯性贬值的数据用户,活动家,生产者,消费者和公民的人力劳动。简要概述正义(Dencik et al., 2016;Taylor 2017)和数据权力的伦理方法,这表明关怀的概念在社会正义框架中插入了特殊性和同理心。通过这种方式,本章描绘了女权主义数据研究和实践理论的理论路线图,该理论侧重于物质性和具体化,并致力于在数据化的世界中扰乱种族,阶级,性别和能力的权力关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信