Forage yield and quality of three rainfed crops in four-row and six-row seedbeds using different fertilization methods

Esteban Salvador Osuna-Ceja, J. Pimentel-López, Miguel Ángel Martínez-Gamiño, B. Figueroa-Sandoval
{"title":"Forage yield and quality of three rainfed crops in four-row and six-row seedbeds using different fertilization methods","authors":"Esteban Salvador Osuna-Ceja, J. Pimentel-López, Miguel Ángel Martínez-Gamiño, B. Figueroa-Sandoval","doi":"10.5154/r.inagbi.2020.10.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the temperate-semiarid region of Aguascalientes, Mexico, most of the rural population depends on rainfed agriculture related to the family milk production system. Objective: To evaluate the effect of different fertilization practices on forage yield and quality of three rainfed crops in four- and six-row seedbeds. Methodology: Five fertilization treatments were evaluated: T1) control (no fertilization), T2) chemical fertilization (40-40-00 kg·ha-1 of N-P-K), T3) mixture (28-40-00 kg·ha-1 and 26 kg of zeolite), T4) organic fertilizer (5 t·ha-1 of bovine manure) and T5) mycorrhiza (inoculation with 350 g·ha-1 of mycorrhizal substrate). Maize and sunflowers were planted in four rows, and sorghum in six rows. A randomized complete block design with four replicates was used. Results: Dry matter yield in relation to the control, in T2, T3 and T4 was 100, 84 and 26 % for maize, 123, 177 and 67 % for sunflowers, and 52, 49 and 91 % for sorghum, respectively. T5 was higher compared to T1, but without statistical difference. Forage quality of the three crops showed no increase, except for crude protein in T2 and T3. Limitations of the study: Results correspond to a single cycle (spring-summer). Originality: Good agronomic practices for forage production were established. Conclusions: Agronomic practices (minimum tillage, in situ rainwater harvesting, sowing methods and fertilization) generate a positive effect on yield and forage quality in rainfed crops.","PeriodicalId":132972,"journal":{"name":"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.inagbi.2020.10.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the temperate-semiarid region of Aguascalientes, Mexico, most of the rural population depends on rainfed agriculture related to the family milk production system. Objective: To evaluate the effect of different fertilization practices on forage yield and quality of three rainfed crops in four- and six-row seedbeds. Methodology: Five fertilization treatments were evaluated: T1) control (no fertilization), T2) chemical fertilization (40-40-00 kg·ha-1 of N-P-K), T3) mixture (28-40-00 kg·ha-1 and 26 kg of zeolite), T4) organic fertilizer (5 t·ha-1 of bovine manure) and T5) mycorrhiza (inoculation with 350 g·ha-1 of mycorrhizal substrate). Maize and sunflowers were planted in four rows, and sorghum in six rows. A randomized complete block design with four replicates was used. Results: Dry matter yield in relation to the control, in T2, T3 and T4 was 100, 84 and 26 % for maize, 123, 177 and 67 % for sunflowers, and 52, 49 and 91 % for sorghum, respectively. T5 was higher compared to T1, but without statistical difference. Forage quality of the three crops showed no increase, except for crude protein in T2 and T3. Limitations of the study: Results correspond to a single cycle (spring-summer). Originality: Good agronomic practices for forage production were established. Conclusions: Agronomic practices (minimum tillage, in situ rainwater harvesting, sowing methods and fertilization) generate a positive effect on yield and forage quality in rainfed crops.
不同施肥方式对三种旱作作物四行和六行苗床牧草产量和品质的影响
简介:在墨西哥阿瓜斯卡连特斯的温带半干旱地区,大多数农村人口依靠与家庭牛奶生产系统相关的雨养农业。目的:评价不同施肥方式对三种旱作作物四行和六行苗床牧草产量和品质的影响。方法:对5种施肥处理进行评价:T1)对照(不施肥),T2)化学施肥(N-P-K 40-40-00 kg·ha-1), T3)混合施肥(28-40-00 kg·ha-1加沸石26 kg), T4)有机肥(牛粪5 t·ha-1)和T5)菌根(接种菌根底物350 g·ha-1)。玉米和向日葵分成四行,高粱分成六行。采用随机完全区组设计,共4个重复。结果:玉米在T2、T3和T4的干物质产量分别为100、84和26%,向日葵为123、177和67%,高粱为52、49和91%。T5高于T1,但无统计学差异。除粗蛋白质外,3种作物的饲料品质在T2和T3期均无显著提高。研究的局限性:结果只对应一个周期(春夏)。原创性:建立了牧草生产的良好农艺规范。结论:农艺措施(少耕、就地雨水收集、播种方法和施肥)对旱作作物的产量和饲料质量产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信