Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers
Prachi Kumar, R. Bhargava, Y. Arora, Sidharth Kaushal, Manjushri Kumar
{"title":"Conjunctival impression cytology versus routine tear function tests for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers","authors":"Prachi Kumar, R. Bhargava, Y. Arora, Sidharth Kaushal, Manjushri Kumar","doi":"10.4103/0970-9371.171242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their correlation with dry eye symptoms. Setting: A case control study was done at three referral eye centers. Materials and Methods: The eyes of 230 contact lens users were compared to 250 eyes of age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were recruited based on their response to a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms, (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS©) and measurements of TBUT, Schirmer test, and CIC was done. A correlation analysis between symptom severity and tear film tests was performed. Pearson's coefficient, R2 > 0.5 was considered significant. Results: As compared to controls (r2 = 0.010), Nelson grade correlated significantly with dry eye symptoms (r2 = 0.765), among cases. However, there was moderate correlation between dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, and TBUT (r2 = 0.557 and 0.530, respectively) among cases and a weak correlation among controls (r2 = 0.130 and 0.054, respectively). The sensitivity of TBUT was 86.4%, specificity was 82.4%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.85)], and negative LR was 0.09. The sensitivity of the Schirmer test was 48.2%, specificity 88%, LR 2.12 (95% CI 1.48-2.96), and negative LR 0.83. Conclusion: CIC correlates better than Schirmer and TBUT with dry eye symptoms. It may be the most appropriate test for dry-eye evaluation in contact lens wearers.","PeriodicalId":182593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.171242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Aims: Prolonged contact lens wear is often accompanied by dryness of the eyes. The aim of this study was to compare conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) and tear film tests such as tear film break up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test for dry eye evaluation in contact lens wearers and measure their correlation with dry eye symptoms. Setting: A case control study was done at three referral eye centers. Materials and Methods: The eyes of 230 contact lens users were compared to 250 eyes of age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were recruited based on their response to a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms, (Dry Eye Scoring System, DESS©) and measurements of TBUT, Schirmer test, and CIC was done. A correlation analysis between symptom severity and tear film tests was performed. Pearson's coefficient, R2 > 0.5 was considered significant. Results: As compared to controls (r2 = 0.010), Nelson grade correlated significantly with dry eye symptoms (r2 = 0.765), among cases. However, there was moderate correlation between dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, and TBUT (r2 = 0.557 and 0.530, respectively) among cases and a weak correlation among controls (r2 = 0.130 and 0.054, respectively). The sensitivity of TBUT was 86.4%, specificity was 82.4%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.46-5.85)], and negative LR was 0.09. The sensitivity of the Schirmer test was 48.2%, specificity 88%, LR 2.12 (95% CI 1.48-2.96), and negative LR 0.83. Conclusion: CIC correlates better than Schirmer and TBUT with dry eye symptoms. It may be the most appropriate test for dry-eye evaluation in contact lens wearers.
结膜印象细胞学与常规泪液功能测试对隐形眼镜佩戴者干眼评估的影响
目的:长时间佩戴隐形眼镜往往伴随着眼睛干燥。本研究的目的是比较结膜印象细胞学(CIC)和泪膜测试,如泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和Schirmer测试对隐形眼镜佩戴者干眼的评估,并测量它们与干眼症状的相关性。背景:在三个转诊眼科中心进行病例对照研究。材料和方法:将230名隐形眼镜使用者的眼睛与250名年龄和性别匹配的对照眼睛进行比较。根据干眼症状问卷(dry eye Scoring System, DESS©)和TBUT、Schirmer测试和CIC的测量结果招募参与者。对症状严重程度与泪膜试验进行相关性分析。皮尔逊系数R2 > 0.5为显著性。结果:与对照组相比(r2 = 0.010), Nelson分级与干眼症状显著相关(r2 = 0.765)。然而,干眼症状、Schirmer试验和TBUT在病例间存在中度相关性(r2分别为0.557和0.530),而在对照组间存在弱相关性(r2分别为0.130和0.054)。TBUT的敏感性为86.4%,特异性为82.4%,阳性似然比(LR)为4.50[95%可信区间(CI) 3.46 ~ 5.85],阴性似然比为0.09。Schirmer试验敏感性为48.2%,特异性为88%,LR为2.12 (95% CI 1.48 ~ 2.96),阴性LR为0.83。结论:CIC与干眼症状的相关性优于Schirmer和TBUT。这可能是对隐形眼镜佩戴者进行干眼症评估的最合适的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。