Keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Digantungkan Pada Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Denise Elysia
{"title":"Keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Digantungkan Pada Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang","authors":"Denise Elysia","doi":"10.32528/FAJ.V17I1.2210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sale and purchase binding agreement is a legal breakthrough that was born out of the needs of the community. Used by the parties as a preliminary agreement because it has not been able to fulfill the conditions to carry out the sale and purchase before the officials of the land deed. However, in practice, binding of sale and purchase agreement is made not because of the sale and purchase transaction but as debt guarantee which the debtor plays as the seller and th e creditor as the buyer. So the problem is how the legitimacy of binding agreement of sale and purchase as well as the sale power suspended as debt guarantee? then what is the basis of legal considerations for judges in deciding cases binding sale and purchase agreement that hung as debt guarantee ?. This research is a normative juridical research by using approach of legislation, concept and case. From the result of the research, it is concluded that the deed made by the parties before the notary is valid a s an authentic deed which has been in accordance with the legislation, and the sale power is a unity in the sale and purchase agreement , where the seller authorizes the buyer to do duty rather than an authorizer. The sale power made by the parties is also an authentic deed and not an absolute authority prohibited by the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14/ 1982 because it does not contain an element of transfer of rights. Based on several considerations of the judge, it can be deduced that as long as the deed of sale and purchase agreement of sale and sale has been made and executed legally as authentic deed which has perfect evidentiary power, then the deed can not be canceled.","PeriodicalId":423787,"journal":{"name":"Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32528/FAJ.V17I1.2210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sale and purchase binding agreement is a legal breakthrough that was born out of the needs of the community. Used by the parties as a preliminary agreement because it has not been able to fulfill the conditions to carry out the sale and purchase before the officials of the land deed. However, in practice, binding of sale and purchase agreement is made not because of the sale and purchase transaction but as debt guarantee which the debtor plays as the seller and th e creditor as the buyer. So the problem is how the legitimacy of binding agreement of sale and purchase as well as the sale power suspended as debt guarantee? then what is the basis of legal considerations for judges in deciding cases binding sale and purchase agreement that hung as debt guarantee ?. This research is a normative juridical research by using approach of legislation, concept and case. From the result of the research, it is concluded that the deed made by the parties before the notary is valid a s an authentic deed which has been in accordance with the legislation, and the sale power is a unity in the sale and purchase agreement , where the seller authorizes the buyer to do duty rather than an authorizer. The sale power made by the parties is also an authentic deed and not an absolute authority prohibited by the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14/ 1982 because it does not contain an element of transfer of rights. Based on several considerations of the judge, it can be deduced that as long as the deed of sale and purchase agreement of sale and sale has been made and executed legally as authentic deed which has perfect evidentiary power, then the deed can not be canceled.
债券的效力取决于偿还债务的义务
买卖合约是一项法律突破,是因应社会需要而产生的。使用契约作为双方当事人的初步协议,因为它在尚未能够履行买卖条件之前才正式进行土地契约。但是,在实践中,买卖协议的约束力不是因为买卖交易本身,而是作为债务人作为卖方,债权人作为买方的债务担保而产生的。那么问题来了,具有约束力的买卖协议的合法性以及作为债务担保的销货权如何被中止?那么,法官在裁定以债务担保形式悬挂的具有约束力的买卖协议案件时,其法律考虑依据是什么?本研究是运用立法、概念、案例等方法进行的规范性司法研究。从研究结果来看,当事人在公证员面前所作的契约是有效的,是符合法律规定的真实契约,买卖权是买卖协议中的一个统一体,卖方授权买方履行义务,而不是授权人。当事各方作出的出售权力也是一种真实的行为,而不是1982年第14号内政部长指示所禁止的绝对权力,因为它不包含权利转让的因素。根据法官的几点考虑,可以推断出,只要买卖契约作为具有完善举证能力的真实契约合法订立和执行,那么该契约就不能被撤销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信