Using nasogastric suction but no cricoid pressure in rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia: Outcome in a series of 224 cases of acute abdomen

M. Ajmal
{"title":"Using nasogastric suction but no cricoid pressure in rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia: Outcome in a series of 224 cases of acute abdomen","authors":"M. Ajmal","doi":"10.15761/srj.1000152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Classic rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia involves cricoid pressure. We, however, use an alternative because classical rapid sequence induction experience with hypoxaemia due to possible impedance of endotracheal intubation. A prospective observational study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of the alternative induction technique. The objective was to determine the incidence of regurgitation of gastric contents when using this technique. Methods: During an 8-year period, general anaesthesia in patients suffering from acute abdomen was induced by placing them in a 150 reverse Trendelenberg position and using nasogastric suction in the peri-induction period. Peri-induction period was defined as the period from patient’s arrival in the operating room until immediately before starting the induction. Cricoid pressure was not applied. Their intra-abdominal pressure was also measured before general anaesthesia was induced. The incidence of regurgitation at induction was the end-point measure. Results: In 224 consecutive patients with mean intra-abdominal pressure at least two times higher than normal (mean pressure 23, 11.5 and 9 mmHg in adults, children & neonates respectively), no clinically identifiable incidence of regurgitation was noted (0/224 or 0%). Conclusion: Rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia can be safely and successfully performed in patients suffering from acute abdomen using nasogastric suction and omitting cricoid pressure. The findings of this study justify the need to perform larger trials to further validate this technique. *Correspondence to: Muhammad Ajmal, Locum Anaesthetist, ID Medical locum agency, Milton Keynes, UK, Tel: 00447575770303; E-mail: Ajmal_c@hotmail.com","PeriodicalId":369473,"journal":{"name":"Surgery and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/srj.1000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Classic rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia involves cricoid pressure. We, however, use an alternative because classical rapid sequence induction experience with hypoxaemia due to possible impedance of endotracheal intubation. A prospective observational study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of the alternative induction technique. The objective was to determine the incidence of regurgitation of gastric contents when using this technique. Methods: During an 8-year period, general anaesthesia in patients suffering from acute abdomen was induced by placing them in a 150 reverse Trendelenberg position and using nasogastric suction in the peri-induction period. Peri-induction period was defined as the period from patient’s arrival in the operating room until immediately before starting the induction. Cricoid pressure was not applied. Their intra-abdominal pressure was also measured before general anaesthesia was induced. The incidence of regurgitation at induction was the end-point measure. Results: In 224 consecutive patients with mean intra-abdominal pressure at least two times higher than normal (mean pressure 23, 11.5 and 9 mmHg in adults, children & neonates respectively), no clinically identifiable incidence of regurgitation was noted (0/224 or 0%). Conclusion: Rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia can be safely and successfully performed in patients suffering from acute abdomen using nasogastric suction and omitting cricoid pressure. The findings of this study justify the need to perform larger trials to further validate this technique. *Correspondence to: Muhammad Ajmal, Locum Anaesthetist, ID Medical locum agency, Milton Keynes, UK, Tel: 00447575770303; E-mail: Ajmal_c@hotmail.com
采用鼻胃吸吸不施加环状膜压力快速顺序诱导全麻:224例急腹症患者的结果
背景:典型的快速序列全麻诱导涉及环状膜压力。然而,我们使用另一种方法,因为经典的快速序列诱导经验与低氧血症,由于可能的阻抗气管插管。进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,以评估替代诱导技术的安全性和有效性。目的是确定使用这种技术时胃内容物反流的发生率。方法:在8年的时间里,对急腹症患者进行全身麻醉,将患者置于150逆Trendelenberg体位,并在诱导期使用鼻吸胃。围引产期定义为从患者进入手术室到引产开始前的一段时间。没有施加环状软骨压力。在全身麻醉前测量腹腔内压。终点测量为诱导时的反流发生率。结果:在连续224例平均腹内压高于正常水平至少2倍的患者中(成人、儿童和新生儿的平均腹内压分别为23,11.5和9mmhg),没有临床可识别的反流发生率(0/224或0%)。结论:在急腹症患者中,采用鼻胃抽吸,省去环状压力,可以安全、成功地进行快速顺序诱导全身麻醉。这项研究的结果证明需要进行更大规模的试验来进一步验证这种技术。*通讯:Muhammad Ajmal,麻醉师,ID医疗机构,米尔顿凯恩斯,英国,电话:00447575770303;电子邮件:Ajmal_c@hotmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信