Development and Quality Evaluation of Non-Dairy Yogurts

Hina Naz, Nighat Raza, Shamas Murtaza, Ambreen Naz, Umar Farooq
{"title":"Development and Quality Evaluation of Non-Dairy Yogurts","authors":"Hina Naz, Nighat Raza, Shamas Murtaza, Ambreen Naz, Umar Farooq","doi":"10.54393/df.v4i01.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of fermented vegetarian milk based food will be important to fulfill nutritional value of both elderly and individuals that require more energy intake. Objective: To develop non-dairy vegan yogurts from soy milk, oat milk and coconut milk in conjunction with lactic acid fermentation. Methods: Soy yogurt, oat yogurt and coconut yogurt was analyzed for crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, carbohydrates, ash contents, moisture contents, titratable acidity, total soluble solids and pH analysis and to check its quality and acceptability by sensory evaluation for color, aroma, taste, consistency and acidity. Results: The mean values of crude protein of yogurts showed that soy yogurt contain more protein contents than other yogurts that was 6.0±0.1. The mean values for crude fat contents showed that maximum value 8.5±0.65 was noticed in the coconut yogurt and lowest value 3.1±0.1 was observed in soy yogurt. Mean values of crude fiber showed that fiber contents are present in more amount in soy yogurt (1.93±0.152). The mean maximum value for moisture contents was 84.43±4.007 that was noticed in soy yogurt and lowest value 66.69±0.164 was observed in oat yogurt. Mean values for carbohydrate in soy, oat and coconut yogurt was 9.28±0.01, 20.76±0.659 and 16.16±1.258. Mean results of overall acceptability of soy yogurt, oat yogurt and coconut yogurt was 7±0.35, 7.25±0.36 and 8±0.4 respectively. Conclusions: The study's findings demonstrated that it is possible to make plant-based yoghurt to meet the organoleptic needs of consumers, particularly those who are lactose intolerant or follow a vegan diet.","PeriodicalId":253971,"journal":{"name":"DIET FACTOR (Journal of Nutritional & Food Sciences)","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIET FACTOR (Journal of Nutritional & Food Sciences)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/df.v4i01.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development of fermented vegetarian milk based food will be important to fulfill nutritional value of both elderly and individuals that require more energy intake. Objective: To develop non-dairy vegan yogurts from soy milk, oat milk and coconut milk in conjunction with lactic acid fermentation. Methods: Soy yogurt, oat yogurt and coconut yogurt was analyzed for crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, carbohydrates, ash contents, moisture contents, titratable acidity, total soluble solids and pH analysis and to check its quality and acceptability by sensory evaluation for color, aroma, taste, consistency and acidity. Results: The mean values of crude protein of yogurts showed that soy yogurt contain more protein contents than other yogurts that was 6.0±0.1. The mean values for crude fat contents showed that maximum value 8.5±0.65 was noticed in the coconut yogurt and lowest value 3.1±0.1 was observed in soy yogurt. Mean values of crude fiber showed that fiber contents are present in more amount in soy yogurt (1.93±0.152). The mean maximum value for moisture contents was 84.43±4.007 that was noticed in soy yogurt and lowest value 66.69±0.164 was observed in oat yogurt. Mean values for carbohydrate in soy, oat and coconut yogurt was 9.28±0.01, 20.76±0.659 and 16.16±1.258. Mean results of overall acceptability of soy yogurt, oat yogurt and coconut yogurt was 7±0.35, 7.25±0.36 and 8±0.4 respectively. Conclusions: The study's findings demonstrated that it is possible to make plant-based yoghurt to meet the organoleptic needs of consumers, particularly those who are lactose intolerant or follow a vegan diet.
非乳类酸奶的开发与质量评价
以发酵素乳为基础的食品的开发对于满足老年人和需要更多能量摄入的个体的营养价值具有重要意义。目的:以豆浆、燕麦奶和椰奶为原料,结合乳酸发酵,研制无乳纯素酸奶。方法:对大豆酸奶、燕麦酸奶和椰子酸奶进行粗蛋白质、粗脂肪、粗纤维、碳水化合物、灰分含量、水分含量、可滴定酸度、总可溶性固形物和pH值分析,并通过色、香、味、稠度和酸度等感官评价来检验其质量和可接受性。结果:酸奶粗蛋白质平均值为6.0±0.1,大豆酸奶蛋白质含量高于其他酸奶。粗脂肪含量平均值表明,椰子酸奶的粗脂肪含量最大值为8.5±0.65,大豆酸奶的粗脂肪含量平均值为3.1±0.1。粗纤维平均值表明,大豆酸奶中粗纤维含量较高(1.93±0.152)。大豆酸奶的平均水分含量最大值为84.43±4.007,燕麦酸奶的平均水分含量最低为66.69±0.164。大豆、燕麦和椰子酸奶中碳水化合物的平均值分别为9.28±0.01、20.76±0.659和16.16±1.258。大豆酸奶、燕麦酸奶和椰子酸奶的总体可接受度平均值分别为7±0.35、7.25±0.36和8±0.4。结论:研究结果表明,植物性酸奶有可能满足消费者的感官需求,特别是那些乳糖不耐症或素食者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信