Wisdom of Crowds: Cross-sectional Variation in the Informativeness of Third-Party-Generated Product Information on Twitter

Vicki Wei Tang
{"title":"Wisdom of Crowds: Cross-sectional Variation in the Informativeness of Third-Party-Generated Product Information on Twitter","authors":"Vicki Wei Tang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2775389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether third-party-generated nonfinancial information on Twitter, once aggregated at the firm level, is predictive of upcoming firm-level fundamentals, and if so, what factors determine the cross-sectional variation in the predictive power. First, this study finds that the predictive power of nonfinancial information on Twitter is greater for firms whose major customers are consumers than for firms whose major customers are businesses. Second, the predictive power of the volume and valence of Twitter comments about products and brands with respect to firm-level fundamentals varies with the level of advertising. However, professionals in the capital markets, such as analysts, do not fully incorporate the implications for upcoming sales of the collective wisdom on Twitter. Analysts do not revise their forecasts of sales in response to the change in Twitter information, and thus, the consensus forecast error is systematically biased conditional on nonfinancial information disseminated on Twitter.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2775389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

This paper examines whether third-party-generated nonfinancial information on Twitter, once aggregated at the firm level, is predictive of upcoming firm-level fundamentals, and if so, what factors determine the cross-sectional variation in the predictive power. First, this study finds that the predictive power of nonfinancial information on Twitter is greater for firms whose major customers are consumers than for firms whose major customers are businesses. Second, the predictive power of the volume and valence of Twitter comments about products and brands with respect to firm-level fundamentals varies with the level of advertising. However, professionals in the capital markets, such as analysts, do not fully incorporate the implications for upcoming sales of the collective wisdom on Twitter. Analysts do not revise their forecasts of sales in response to the change in Twitter information, and thus, the consensus forecast error is systematically biased conditional on nonfinancial information disseminated on Twitter.
群体智慧:Twitter上第三方生成产品信息信息量的横断面变化
本文研究了Twitter上第三方生成的非财务信息,一旦在公司层面上汇总,是否可以预测即将到来的公司层面的基本面,如果是这样,哪些因素决定了预测能力的横截面变化。首先,本研究发现,Twitter上非财务信息的预测能力对于以消费者为主要客户的公司比以企业为主要客户的公司更强。其次,Twitter上关于产品和品牌的评论的数量和价值对公司基本面的预测能力随着广告的水平而变化。然而,资本市场的专业人士,如分析师,并没有完全理解Twitter上即将到来的集体智慧销售的含义。分析师不会根据Twitter信息的变化修改他们的销售预测,因此,共识预测误差系统地偏向于Twitter上传播的非财务信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信