Investigating the strengths and difficulties of children from families with a parental mental illness

D. Maybery, A. Reupert, M. Goodyear, Rani Ritchie, P. Brann
{"title":"Investigating the strengths and difficulties of children from families with a parental mental illness","authors":"D. Maybery, A. Reupert, M. Goodyear, Rani Ritchie, P. Brann","doi":"10.5172/jamh.8.2.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated whether two groups of children from families with a parent with a mental illness were different to a normative group of children (no parental illness) on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Of the total 833 children aged 8-12 years, there were 101 children of parents with a mental illness from the general community, 134 children of parents with a mental illness who attended an intervention program and a normative sample of 598. The intervention group scored significantly higher than the other groups on all difficulties. In addition, the general community group with a parental illness scored significantly higher than those without a parental mental illness on the Total Difficulties, Emotional Symptoms and Hyperactivity subscales. These were important findings as the community and intervention children with a parent with a mental illness scored at two and three times respectively the normative level of risk to their mental health. Combined with previous risk estimates, children with a parent who attend mental health services are between two to five times more likely than the norm to be scoring in the clinical range on the SDQ. Recommendations are made regarding child morbidity, mental health policy, programs, workforce and future research.","PeriodicalId":358240,"journal":{"name":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.8.2.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated whether two groups of children from families with a parent with a mental illness were different to a normative group of children (no parental illness) on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Of the total 833 children aged 8-12 years, there were 101 children of parents with a mental illness from the general community, 134 children of parents with a mental illness who attended an intervention program and a normative sample of 598. The intervention group scored significantly higher than the other groups on all difficulties. In addition, the general community group with a parental illness scored significantly higher than those without a parental mental illness on the Total Difficulties, Emotional Symptoms and Hyperactivity subscales. These were important findings as the community and intervention children with a parent with a mental illness scored at two and three times respectively the normative level of risk to their mental health. Combined with previous risk estimates, children with a parent who attend mental health services are between two to five times more likely than the norm to be scoring in the clinical range on the SDQ. Recommendations are made regarding child morbidity, mental health policy, programs, workforce and future research.
调查来自父母有精神疾病家庭的孩子的优势和困难
摘要本研究旨在探讨两组父母均有精神疾病的儿童在优势与困难问卷(SDQ)上与正常父母均无精神疾病的儿童是否存在差异。在总共833名8-12岁的儿童中,有101名父母患有精神疾病的儿童来自普通社区,134名父母患有精神疾病的儿童参加了干预计划,还有598名标准样本。干预组在所有困难上的得分都明显高于其他组。此外,在总体困难、情绪症状和多动亚量表上,有父母精神疾病的普通社区群体的得分明显高于没有父母精神疾病的群体。这些都是重要的发现,因为父母有精神疾病的社区和干预儿童的心理健康风险得分分别是标准水平的两倍和三倍。结合之前的风险估计,父母参加心理健康服务的儿童在SDQ临床范围内得分的可能性是正常儿童的两到五倍。就儿童发病率、精神卫生政策、方案、劳动力和未来研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信