A Smart Competence-Based Prioritisation for Learning Programmes

M. Gaeta, Antonio Marzano, Sergio Miranda, K. Sandkuhl
{"title":"A Smart Competence-Based Prioritisation for Learning Programmes","authors":"M. Gaeta, Antonio Marzano, Sergio Miranda, K. Sandkuhl","doi":"10.1109/INCoS.2015.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In public and local administration contexts, the organizational structures depend on bureaucratic aspects. This often implies that people are engaged in offices and their allocation come from emergencies and political factors instead of rational motivations related to knowledge, competences and profiles. In most cases, such situations become gangrenous and generate dissatisfaction and low productivity. The objective of our work is applying competence management, skill gap analysis and a study of the existing organizational structures to point out the functional unit with the most critical situation in terms of allocated employees and to suggest a solution according to the complex laws, internal regulation for the staff management and trade-union influences. The proposed approach identifies the real gaps that create inefficiencies and suggests the people to engage in learning programs by focusing exactly on what the organizations need with respect to what the employees have. It happens by elaborating a priority scale on the base of existing hierarchies, relationships, logistic constraints and other aspects with the aim, above all, of enhancing the identified unit and the local administration itself.","PeriodicalId":345650,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2015.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In public and local administration contexts, the organizational structures depend on bureaucratic aspects. This often implies that people are engaged in offices and their allocation come from emergencies and political factors instead of rational motivations related to knowledge, competences and profiles. In most cases, such situations become gangrenous and generate dissatisfaction and low productivity. The objective of our work is applying competence management, skill gap analysis and a study of the existing organizational structures to point out the functional unit with the most critical situation in terms of allocated employees and to suggest a solution according to the complex laws, internal regulation for the staff management and trade-union influences. The proposed approach identifies the real gaps that create inefficiencies and suggests the people to engage in learning programs by focusing exactly on what the organizations need with respect to what the employees have. It happens by elaborating a priority scale on the base of existing hierarchies, relationships, logistic constraints and other aspects with the aim, above all, of enhancing the identified unit and the local administration itself.
学习计划的智能能力优先排序
在公共和地方行政环境中,组织结构取决于官僚方面。这往往意味着人们从事办公室工作,他们的分配来自紧急情况和政治因素,而不是与知识、能力和概况有关的理性动机。在大多数情况下,这种情况会恶化,并产生不满和低生产率。我们的工作目标是运用能力管理、技能差距分析和对现有组织结构的研究,指出在分配员工方面情况最危急的职能单位,并根据复杂的法律、员工管理的内部规定和工会的影响提出解决方案。所提出的方法确定了造成效率低下的真正差距,并建议人们通过准确地关注组织对员工所拥有的东西的需求来参与学习计划。它是通过在现有等级、关系、后勤限制和其他方面的基础上制定优先等级来实现的,其首要目的是加强已确定的单位和地方行政本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信