Assessment of Economic Viability of Small-Scale Farms in Serbia

A. Miljatović, V. Vukoje
{"title":"Assessment of Economic Viability of Small-Scale Farms in Serbia","authors":"A. Miljatović, V. Vukoje","doi":"10.2478/contagri-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary This paper deals with production and economic results of small-scale farms in the Republic of Serbia. Small-scale farms include farms with standard output value from 4,000 to 25,000 euros. The main aim of the paper is to determine and evaluate profitability and productivity of farms engaged in different types of farming. Economic viability of farms was determined based on profitability and productivity indicators. Although these indicators are not the only indicators of economic viability, they are most commonly used and the most reliable. The farms are divided into seven groups of farming: field crops, horticulture, vineyards and fruits, dairy production, livestock production – grazing livestock, granivores, mixed crops–livestock. The analysis was based on FADN data for a 5-year period (2015-2019). The number of farms in the sample was increasing over the years, reaching 1,655 in 2019, while a large number of them belonged to a class of small-scale farms (48.5%). Utilised agricultural area on average ranged from 9.2 ha to 10.8 ha per farm. The highest labour input was recorded in horticulture (2.5 – 4.0 AWU), while the lowest labour input was determined for field crops (1.5 – 2.0 AWU). The values of profitability and productivtity indicators were the highest for horticulture farms, which had the highest ROE indicator (0.257) and FNVA per AWU (11.4 thousands euros) in 2019. On the other hand, farms involved in grazing livestock had the lowest results, with ROE of 0.127 and FNVA per AWU of 6.4 thousands euros in 2019. As expected, more intensive types of farming (horticulture and granivores) achieved better results, so these farms are considered as more economically viable. Furthermore, less intensive types of farming (grazing livestock and mixed crops-livestock) should make better use of natural and internal resources, while farmers, especially younger ones, should withdraw from traditional and old-fashioned ways of production and be more innovative and creative in farm management.","PeriodicalId":221412,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Agriculture","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/contagri-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary This paper deals with production and economic results of small-scale farms in the Republic of Serbia. Small-scale farms include farms with standard output value from 4,000 to 25,000 euros. The main aim of the paper is to determine and evaluate profitability and productivity of farms engaged in different types of farming. Economic viability of farms was determined based on profitability and productivity indicators. Although these indicators are not the only indicators of economic viability, they are most commonly used and the most reliable. The farms are divided into seven groups of farming: field crops, horticulture, vineyards and fruits, dairy production, livestock production – grazing livestock, granivores, mixed crops–livestock. The analysis was based on FADN data for a 5-year period (2015-2019). The number of farms in the sample was increasing over the years, reaching 1,655 in 2019, while a large number of them belonged to a class of small-scale farms (48.5%). Utilised agricultural area on average ranged from 9.2 ha to 10.8 ha per farm. The highest labour input was recorded in horticulture (2.5 – 4.0 AWU), while the lowest labour input was determined for field crops (1.5 – 2.0 AWU). The values of profitability and productivtity indicators were the highest for horticulture farms, which had the highest ROE indicator (0.257) and FNVA per AWU (11.4 thousands euros) in 2019. On the other hand, farms involved in grazing livestock had the lowest results, with ROE of 0.127 and FNVA per AWU of 6.4 thousands euros in 2019. As expected, more intensive types of farming (horticulture and granivores) achieved better results, so these farms are considered as more economically viable. Furthermore, less intensive types of farming (grazing livestock and mixed crops-livestock) should make better use of natural and internal resources, while farmers, especially younger ones, should withdraw from traditional and old-fashioned ways of production and be more innovative and creative in farm management.
塞尔维亚小型农场经济可行性评估
本文论述了塞尔维亚共和国小规模农场的生产和经济效益。小规模农场包括标准产值在4000欧元到25000欧元之间的农场。本文的主要目的是确定和评估从事不同类型农业的农场的盈利能力和生产力。农场的经济生存能力是根据盈利能力和生产力指标确定的。虽然这些指标不是经济可行性的唯一指标,但它们是最常用和最可靠的指标。农场被分为7类耕作:大田作物、园艺、葡萄园和水果、乳制品生产、畜牧生产——放牧牲畜、花岗动物、混合作物——畜牧。该分析基于FADN 5年(2015-2019年)的数据。样本中的农场数量逐年增加,2019年达到1655家,其中大部分属于小规模农场(48.5%)。每个农场的平均利用农业面积为9.2公顷至10.8公顷。园艺的劳动投入最高(2.5 - 4.0 AWU),而大田作物的劳动投入最低(1.5 - 2.0 AWU)。2019年,园艺农场的盈利能力和生产率指标最高,ROE指标(0.257)和每AWU的FNVA(11.4万欧元)最高。另一方面,涉及放牧牲畜的农场的结果最低,2019年的ROE为0.127,每AWU的FNVA为6.4万欧元。正如预期的那样,更集约化的农业类型(园艺和花岗动物)取得了更好的结果,因此这些农场被认为在经济上更可行。此外,集约化程度较低的耕作类型(放牧牲畜和混合作物-牲畜)应更好地利用自然资源和内部资源,而农民,特别是年轻农民应退出传统和老式的生产方式,在农场管理方面更具创新性和创造性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信