CURRENT TRENDS IN CASE LAW ON CROSS-BORDER TAX DISPUTES IN CHINA

Na Li
{"title":"CURRENT TRENDS IN CASE LAW ON CROSS-BORDER TAX DISPUTES IN CHINA","authors":"Na Li","doi":"10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-37-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: tax disputes in China cover a wide range of relationships and transactions. The number of court decisions is limited, but they allow us to determine a number of trends related to the resolution of tax disputes. In particular, Chinese courts do not take into account the opinion of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in resolving such cases. This might be rooted with China’s position to protect the interests of the state as a reflection of it being one of the largest foreign investment recipients in the world.\n\nMethods: analysis, comparison, description, interpretation. The subject of the study were the rules of law and decisions of Chinese courts on the resolution of tax disputes, as well as statistical data.\n\nAnalysis: disputes may most possibly arise from those anti-tax avoidance investigations carried out by Chinese tax authorities. The aggressive approaches that Chinese tax authorities used in interpreting and applying tax treaties might trigger more cross-border tax disputes. And this risk will be exacerbated when tax authorities are pressed to meet the revenue target assigned to them.\n\nResults: while aggressive anti-avoidance measures are becoming effective tools for collecting incomes, the number of disputes is growing. As a consequence, the role of the judiciary in the mechanism of legal protection of participants in tax disputes will also increase. It seems that the number of appeals to the courts for the resolution of such cases will increase too.","PeriodicalId":215513,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-37-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: tax disputes in China cover a wide range of relationships and transactions. The number of court decisions is limited, but they allow us to determine a number of trends related to the resolution of tax disputes. In particular, Chinese courts do not take into account the opinion of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in resolving such cases. This might be rooted with China’s position to protect the interests of the state as a reflection of it being one of the largest foreign investment recipients in the world. Methods: analysis, comparison, description, interpretation. The subject of the study were the rules of law and decisions of Chinese courts on the resolution of tax disputes, as well as statistical data. Analysis: disputes may most possibly arise from those anti-tax avoidance investigations carried out by Chinese tax authorities. The aggressive approaches that Chinese tax authorities used in interpreting and applying tax treaties might trigger more cross-border tax disputes. And this risk will be exacerbated when tax authorities are pressed to meet the revenue target assigned to them. Results: while aggressive anti-avoidance measures are becoming effective tools for collecting incomes, the number of disputes is growing. As a consequence, the role of the judiciary in the mechanism of legal protection of participants in tax disputes will also increase. It seems that the number of appeals to the courts for the resolution of such cases will increase too.
中国跨境税收纠纷判例法的发展趋势
导读:中国的税务纠纷涉及的关系和交易非常广泛。法院判决的数量是有限的,但它们使我们能够确定与解决税务纠纷有关的一些趋势。特别是,中国法院在解决此类案件时没有考虑经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的意见。这可能源于中国保护国家利益的立场,这反映出中国是世界上最大的外国投资接受国之一。方法:分析、比较、描述、解释。这项研究的主题是中国法院在解决税务纠纷方面的法律规则和判决,以及统计数据。分析:争议极有可能由中国税务机关开展的反避税调查引起。中国税务机关在解释和适用税收协定时采取的激进手段,可能引发更多跨境税收纠纷。而当税务机关被迫完成分配给他们的收入目标时,这种风险将会加剧。结果:虽然积极的反避税措施正在成为征收收入的有效工具,但纠纷的数量正在增加。因此,司法部门在税收纠纷参与方的法律保护机制中的作用也将增加。为解决这类案件而向法院提出上诉的数量似乎也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信