Disk drive vintage and its effect on reliability

S. Shah, J. Elerath
{"title":"Disk drive vintage and its effect on reliability","authors":"S. Shah, J. Elerath","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field failure data for 3 disk drive families from 3 drive manufacturers is analyzed. The analyses illustrate the effects of design and manufacturing process improvements implemented throughout the drive's production life on the reliability of disk drives. Also, the resultant effect of convolution of different shipment volumes and different vintage drives reliability is studied. Two drive families show distinct reliability differences between drive vintages. The newer vintage drives are more reliable than the older vintage drives. One interesting observation is the ratio of average failure rate during the first three or four months of production to the average failure rate later in time when failure rate has stabilized. This ratio is observed to be between 2 and 3. One drive family, on the other hand, showed almost no difference in the reliability between vintages because of a dominant failure mechanism that was unaffected by most of the design and manufacturing process changes implemented. Also, if the shipment volumes are high in the beginning period of the drive shipments the overall reliability of the field population may be lower due to a high contribution of the early vintage drives with higher failure rates.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Field failure data for 3 disk drive families from 3 drive manufacturers is analyzed. The analyses illustrate the effects of design and manufacturing process improvements implemented throughout the drive's production life on the reliability of disk drives. Also, the resultant effect of convolution of different shipment volumes and different vintage drives reliability is studied. Two drive families show distinct reliability differences between drive vintages. The newer vintage drives are more reliable than the older vintage drives. One interesting observation is the ratio of average failure rate during the first three or four months of production to the average failure rate later in time when failure rate has stabilized. This ratio is observed to be between 2 and 3. One drive family, on the other hand, showed almost no difference in the reliability between vintages because of a dominant failure mechanism that was unaffected by most of the design and manufacturing process changes implemented. Also, if the shipment volumes are high in the beginning period of the drive shipments the overall reliability of the field population may be lower due to a high contribution of the early vintage drives with higher failure rates.
磁盘驱动器老化及其对可靠性的影响
分析了3个硬盘生产厂家的3个硬盘系列的现场故障数据。分析说明了在整个驱动器的生产寿命中实施的设计和制造过程改进对磁盘驱动器可靠性的影响。此外,还研究了不同出货量和不同古董驱动器可靠性卷积的结果影响。两个驱动器家族在驱动器年份之间显示出明显的可靠性差异。较新的老式驱动器比旧的老式驱动器更可靠。一个有趣的观察结果是,生产的前三四个月的平均故障率与后来故障率稳定后的平均故障率之比。据观察,这个比率在2到3之间。另一方面,一个驱动器家族在不同年份之间的可靠性几乎没有差异,因为主要的失效机制不受大多数设计和制造过程变化的影响。此外,如果在驱动器发货的开始阶段出货量很高,则由于早期老式驱动器的高贡献和较高的故障率,现场人口的整体可靠性可能会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信