Tradespace Organizational Practices: A Case Study

J. Daniels, J. Wagner, C. Turner, D. Gorsich, Denise M. Rizzo, G. Hartman, R. Agusti, Annette Skowronska, M. Castanier, S. H. Rapp
{"title":"Tradespace Organizational Practices: A Case Study","authors":"J. Daniels, J. Wagner, C. Turner, D. Gorsich, Denise M. Rizzo, G. Hartman, R. Agusti, Annette Skowronska, M. Castanier, S. H. Rapp","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-91091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Tradespace analysis capabilities are critical for organizations either selecting large programmatic efforts or those engaged in providing solutions to major program opportunities. The ability of an organization to effectively use the tradespace in their decision-making process had a substantial impact upon programmatic success. Poorly bounded tradespaces may lead to prototype vehicles (or any other system to be designed) that are ultimately unacceptable due to performance, cost, or technical risk issues. Tradespaces that are over-constrained can unduly limit design options and lead to stagnant designs that are unable to incorporate technical innovations. Most organizations find that tradespace analysis presents numerous challenges, so this research aims to address the evaluation of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within an organization. In this study, we explain how an interview-based process was used to perform this analysis and make recommendations for opportunities for process improvement within an organization (Ground Vehicle Systems Center or GVSC). Similar approaches could be applied to other organizations to facilitate the development of an organizational self-assessment that can aid in the identification of internal strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within organizations performing tradespace activities.","PeriodicalId":382970,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-91091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tradespace analysis capabilities are critical for organizations either selecting large programmatic efforts or those engaged in providing solutions to major program opportunities. The ability of an organization to effectively use the tradespace in their decision-making process had a substantial impact upon programmatic success. Poorly bounded tradespaces may lead to prototype vehicles (or any other system to be designed) that are ultimately unacceptable due to performance, cost, or technical risk issues. Tradespaces that are over-constrained can unduly limit design options and lead to stagnant designs that are unable to incorporate technical innovations. Most organizations find that tradespace analysis presents numerous challenges, so this research aims to address the evaluation of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within an organization. In this study, we explain how an interview-based process was used to perform this analysis and make recommendations for opportunities for process improvement within an organization (Ground Vehicle Systems Center or GVSC). Similar approaches could be applied to other organizations to facilitate the development of an organizational self-assessment that can aid in the identification of internal strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within organizations performing tradespace activities.
贸易空间组织实践:案例研究
贸易空间分析能力对于选择大型规划工作或为主要规划机会提供解决方案的组织是至关重要的。组织在决策过程中有效利用贸易空间的能力对规划的成功具有重大影响。由于性能、成本或技术风险问题,边界不佳的交易空间可能导致原型车辆(或任何其他要设计的系统)最终无法接受。过度约束的贸易空间会过度限制设计选择,导致设计停滞不前,无法融入技术创新。大多数组织发现贸易空间分析提出了许多挑战,因此本研究旨在解决组织内优势、劣势和改进机会的评估。在本研究中,我们解释了如何使用基于访谈的过程来执行此分析,并为组织(地面车辆系统中心或GVSC)中的过程改进机会提出建议。类似的方法也可以应用于其他组织,以促进组织自我评估的发展,帮助确定开展贸易空间活动的组织内部的优势、劣势和改进机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信