The Story of Toxic Chemicals in Computing Systems

M. Diamond
{"title":"The Story of Toxic Chemicals in Computing Systems","authors":"M. Diamond","doi":"10.1145/3080556.3080570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protecting human and environmental health from the effects of toxic chemicals is an element of sustainability efforts and respecting global biophysical limits. Can this goal be achieved with respect to toxic chemicals used in computing systems? It is likely no surprise that achieving this goal is a wicked problem characterized by multiple disciplinary silos, knowledge gaps, competing priorities and vested interests, problems between organizational boundaries, the need to change human behavior and economic imperatives, and the unintended consequences of solutions. This talk unpacks the challenge of protecting human and environmental health with respect to (only) one set of chemicals used in computing systems, namely organic flame retardants (FRs). I chose FRs because they are used in all computing system hardware (e.g., cell phones, computer cases, printed circuit boards, wiring), but they migrate from their source polymer with disposition in global human and ecosystem populations. Studies continue to emerge that link exposure to specific FRs with adverse health effects including loss of IQ points and other neurological and neurobehavioral effects, and reproductive effects. The story unfolds with one family of flame retardants (polybrominated diphenyl ethers or PBDEs) that are found globally in human and ecosystem populations and that have been associated with adverse health impacts. PBDEs were widely used in the exterior cases and wiring of computing systems, as well as other uses such as the foam of upholstered furniture. The major source of human exposure was considered to be foam-containing products. In North America, controls on new uses were implemented for two PBDE formulations in 2004 and a third formulation in 2013 due to their toxicity and persistence. This resulted in decreasing concentrations in most environments with the important exception of those handling a poorly quantified mass of e-waste in developed and developing countries. Here, e-waste will continue to be a source of exposure to PBDEs for at least the next decade. A secondary source of exposure to PBDEs comes from new products (e.g., my plastic kitchen spoons) that were presumably manufactured from recycled PBDE-containing polymers such as computer cases.","PeriodicalId":133595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3080556.3080570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Protecting human and environmental health from the effects of toxic chemicals is an element of sustainability efforts and respecting global biophysical limits. Can this goal be achieved with respect to toxic chemicals used in computing systems? It is likely no surprise that achieving this goal is a wicked problem characterized by multiple disciplinary silos, knowledge gaps, competing priorities and vested interests, problems between organizational boundaries, the need to change human behavior and economic imperatives, and the unintended consequences of solutions. This talk unpacks the challenge of protecting human and environmental health with respect to (only) one set of chemicals used in computing systems, namely organic flame retardants (FRs). I chose FRs because they are used in all computing system hardware (e.g., cell phones, computer cases, printed circuit boards, wiring), but they migrate from their source polymer with disposition in global human and ecosystem populations. Studies continue to emerge that link exposure to specific FRs with adverse health effects including loss of IQ points and other neurological and neurobehavioral effects, and reproductive effects. The story unfolds with one family of flame retardants (polybrominated diphenyl ethers or PBDEs) that are found globally in human and ecosystem populations and that have been associated with adverse health impacts. PBDEs were widely used in the exterior cases and wiring of computing systems, as well as other uses such as the foam of upholstered furniture. The major source of human exposure was considered to be foam-containing products. In North America, controls on new uses were implemented for two PBDE formulations in 2004 and a third formulation in 2013 due to their toxicity and persistence. This resulted in decreasing concentrations in most environments with the important exception of those handling a poorly quantified mass of e-waste in developed and developing countries. Here, e-waste will continue to be a source of exposure to PBDEs for at least the next decade. A secondary source of exposure to PBDEs comes from new products (e.g., my plastic kitchen spoons) that were presumably manufactured from recycled PBDE-containing polymers such as computer cases.
计算机系统中有毒化学物质的故事
保护人类和环境健康免受有毒化学品的影响是可持续性努力和尊重全球生物物理极限的一个要素。对于计算机系统中使用的有毒化学品而言,这个目标能否实现?毫无疑问,实现这一目标是一个棘手的问题,其特点是多学科竖井、知识差距、竞争优先级和既得利益、组织边界之间的问题、改变人类行为和经济必要性的需要,以及解决方案的意外后果。本演讲将从计算机系统中使用的一组化学物质即有机阻燃剂(FRs)出发,揭示保护人类和环境健康的挑战。我之所以选择FRs,是因为它们被用于所有的计算系统硬件(例如,手机、电脑外壳、印刷电路板、电线),但它们会随着全球人类和生态系统种群的分布而从它们的来源聚合物迁移。不断出现的研究表明,接触特定的FRs会对健康产生不利影响,包括智商下降、其他神经和神经行为影响以及生殖影响。故事以阻燃剂家族(多溴联苯醚或多溴二苯醚)展开,这些阻燃剂在全球人类和生态系统种群中发现,并与不利的健康影响有关。多溴二苯醚被广泛用于计算机系统的外壳和布线,以及其他用途,如软垫家具的泡沫。人类接触的主要来源被认为是含泡沫产品。在北美,由于多溴二苯醚的毒性和持久性,2004年对两种配方实施了新用途控制,2013年对第三种配方实施了新用途控制。这导致大多数环境中的浓度下降,但发达国家和发展中国家处理大量量化不良的电子废物的重要例外。在这里,至少在未来十年,电子垃圾将继续成为多溴二苯醚的暴露源。接触多溴二苯醚的第二个来源来自新产品(例如,我的塑料厨房勺子),这些新产品可能是由回收的含有多溴二苯醚的聚合物(如电脑机箱)制造的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信