Bitcoin Price Forecasting: A Comparative Study Between Statistical and Machine Learning Methods

Waddah Saeed, H. Shah, M. Jabreel, D. Puig
{"title":"Bitcoin Price Forecasting: A Comparative Study Between Statistical and Machine Learning Methods","authors":"Waddah Saeed, H. Shah, M. Jabreel, D. Puig","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study between statistical and machine learning methods in forecasting Bitcoin's closing prices. Thirteen forecasting methods namely average, naive, drift, auto-regressive integrated moving-average, simple exponential smoothing (SES), Holt, and damped exponential smoothing, the average of SES, Holt and damped methods, exponential smoothing (ETS), bagged ETS, Theta, multilayer perceptron, and extreme learning machines (ELM) were used to forecast the closing prices for the next 14 days. The findings of this study are three folds. First, there are seven forecasting methods outperformed the naive method namely MLP, ELM, damped exponential smoothing, simple exponential smoothing, Theta, ETS, and ARIMA. Second, MLP and ELM showed better forecasting accuracy on both validation and out-of-sample data among the forecasting methods used in this study. Third, the size of the training data is essential factor that should be considered when training forecasting methods.","PeriodicalId":425637,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study between statistical and machine learning methods in forecasting Bitcoin's closing prices. Thirteen forecasting methods namely average, naive, drift, auto-regressive integrated moving-average, simple exponential smoothing (SES), Holt, and damped exponential smoothing, the average of SES, Holt and damped methods, exponential smoothing (ETS), bagged ETS, Theta, multilayer perceptron, and extreme learning machines (ELM) were used to forecast the closing prices for the next 14 days. The findings of this study are three folds. First, there are seven forecasting methods outperformed the naive method namely MLP, ELM, damped exponential smoothing, simple exponential smoothing, Theta, ETS, and ARIMA. Second, MLP and ELM showed better forecasting accuracy on both validation and out-of-sample data among the forecasting methods used in this study. Third, the size of the training data is essential factor that should be considered when training forecasting methods.
比特币价格预测:统计方法与机器学习方法的比较研究
本文对预测比特币收盘价的统计方法和机器学习方法进行了比较研究。采用平均、朴素、漂移、自回归综合移动平均、简单指数平滑(SES)、Holt和阻尼指数平滑、SES、Holt和阻尼方法的平均值、指数平滑(ETS)、袋式ETS、Theta、多层感知器和极限学习机(ELM)等13种预测方法预测未来14天的收盘价。这项研究的发现有三个方面。首先,有7种预测方法优于朴素方法,即MLP、ELM、阻尼指数平滑、简单指数平滑、Theta、ETS和ARIMA。其次,在本研究使用的预测方法中,MLP和ELM在验证数据和样本外数据上的预测精度都较好。第三,训练数据的大小是训练预测方法时需要考虑的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信