A comparative study of indoor propagation models for IEEE 802.11n network

Rawaa Akram M., Aseel H. Al-Nakkash, O. Salim
{"title":"A comparative study of indoor propagation models for IEEE 802.11n network","authors":"Rawaa Akram M., Aseel H. Al-Nakkash, O. Salim","doi":"10.1145/3321289.3321296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indoor propagation models are considered as a mathematical expression to describe the wave propagation as a function of frequency, distance, and other conditions. Choosing the appropriate propagation model for a specific environment requires extensive analyses. The ray tracing 3D shoot-and-bounce ray (SBR) technique employed by Wireless InSite software is adopted in this work to simulate the signal propagation and evaluate its strength. Three indoor scenarios with two cases each; Line of sight (LOS) and non-line of sight (NLOS) are being simulated and tested. The test bed was conducted based on Net Spot software. The Basic objective is to compare the measured and simulated received power in order to introduce the potentials and limitations of using ray tracing to characterize the indoor wireless channel at 2.4 and 5 GHz. The comparison results show an acceptable correlation between experimental and simulation results. The effects of distance, frequency, and obstacles materialized by different furniture features have been investigated. The nodes that are located in LOS at room B outperforms the NLOS nodes which are located at room A by (3 dBm) in terms of mean received power for both frequencies. Long distance contributes significantly in signal strength reduction, where minimum received power equals to (-77 dBm) at 5 GHz is noticed at the corridor due to long distance. In addition, 2.4 GHz case verifies better signal quality due to less path loss, and the corridor scenario gains less difference between both frequencies. The office scenario achieves the minimum Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between experimental and simulation results at both 2.4 and 5 GHz.","PeriodicalId":375095,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology - ICICT '19","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology - ICICT '19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3321289.3321296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Indoor propagation models are considered as a mathematical expression to describe the wave propagation as a function of frequency, distance, and other conditions. Choosing the appropriate propagation model for a specific environment requires extensive analyses. The ray tracing 3D shoot-and-bounce ray (SBR) technique employed by Wireless InSite software is adopted in this work to simulate the signal propagation and evaluate its strength. Three indoor scenarios with two cases each; Line of sight (LOS) and non-line of sight (NLOS) are being simulated and tested. The test bed was conducted based on Net Spot software. The Basic objective is to compare the measured and simulated received power in order to introduce the potentials and limitations of using ray tracing to characterize the indoor wireless channel at 2.4 and 5 GHz. The comparison results show an acceptable correlation between experimental and simulation results. The effects of distance, frequency, and obstacles materialized by different furniture features have been investigated. The nodes that are located in LOS at room B outperforms the NLOS nodes which are located at room A by (3 dBm) in terms of mean received power for both frequencies. Long distance contributes significantly in signal strength reduction, where minimum received power equals to (-77 dBm) at 5 GHz is noticed at the corridor due to long distance. In addition, 2.4 GHz case verifies better signal quality due to less path loss, and the corridor scenario gains less difference between both frequencies. The office scenario achieves the minimum Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between experimental and simulation results at both 2.4 and 5 GHz.
IEEE 802.11n网络室内传播模型的比较研究
室内传播模型被认为是描述波传播作为频率、距离和其他条件的函数的数学表达式。为特定环境选择适当的传播模型需要进行广泛的分析。本文采用无线InSite软件的射线追踪技术,对信号的传播过程进行模拟,并对其强度进行评估。三个室内场景,每个场景两个案例;瞄准线(LOS)和非瞄准线(NLOS)正在进行模拟和测试。试验台是基于Net Spot软件搭建的。基本目标是比较测量和模拟的接收功率,以介绍使用光线追踪来表征2.4 GHz和5 GHz室内无线信道的潜力和局限性。对比结果表明,实验结果与仿真结果具有良好的相关性。我们还研究了距离、频率和不同家具特征所体现的障碍的影响。就两个频率的平均接收功率而言,位于房间B的LOS节点优于位于房间A的NLOS节点(3 dBm)。长距离对信号强度降低有显著贡献,由于距离较远,在走廊上可以注意到5ghz时最小接收功率等于(-77 dBm)。此外,2.4 GHz场景由于路径损耗较小,验证了更好的信号质量,走廊场景两种频率之间的差异较小。该办公场景在2.4 GHz和5 GHz频段均实现了实验结果与仿真结果之间的最小平均绝对误差(MAE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信