Repensando a San Simón, el sincretismo y la autoridad antropológica

C. Mackenzie
{"title":"Repensando a San Simón, el sincretismo y la autoridad antropológica","authors":"C. Mackenzie","doi":"10.32727/26.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tradition of San Simón in Guatemala has long garnered considerable interest among foreign and national academics, tourists, and Guatemalans in general from a range of backgrounds. Many, though not all, are drawn to the ambiguity and multiple identities often attributed to this deity, including associations with Pedro de Alvarado and Judas Iscariot as well as autochthonous figures such as the Maya deity Mam or other figures from Indigenous history and culture. In this article, based primarily on ethnographic research conducted since 1994, I trace opinions and assessments concerning San Simón, from a range of interlocutors, and consider how these have developed over time. I argue that academics especially need to rethink the concept of syncretism as we go about identifying and interpreting cases of “religious mixture”, noting that considerable reflexivity is required when applying thisterm. For many indigenous Guatemalans, especially at the community level, little if any contradiction or ambiguity is expressed regarding the identity(s) of this deity, which leads to the question “syncretic for whom”? That said, others, especially those involved (often beyond the local level) in the promotion and institutionalization of Maya Spirituality, may work to establish a more stable Maya pedigree for this tradition. The way these various points of view are expressed and placed in dialog with each other speaks to a dynamism and creativity which is typical of Maya culture at present and through time.","PeriodicalId":154070,"journal":{"name":"Maya America: Journal of Essays, Commentary, and Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maya America: Journal of Essays, Commentary, and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32727/26.2022.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tradition of San Simón in Guatemala has long garnered considerable interest among foreign and national academics, tourists, and Guatemalans in general from a range of backgrounds. Many, though not all, are drawn to the ambiguity and multiple identities often attributed to this deity, including associations with Pedro de Alvarado and Judas Iscariot as well as autochthonous figures such as the Maya deity Mam or other figures from Indigenous history and culture. In this article, based primarily on ethnographic research conducted since 1994, I trace opinions and assessments concerning San Simón, from a range of interlocutors, and consider how these have developed over time. I argue that academics especially need to rethink the concept of syncretism as we go about identifying and interpreting cases of “religious mixture”, noting that considerable reflexivity is required when applying thisterm. For many indigenous Guatemalans, especially at the community level, little if any contradiction or ambiguity is expressed regarding the identity(s) of this deity, which leads to the question “syncretic for whom”? That said, others, especially those involved (often beyond the local level) in the promotion and institutionalization of Maya Spirituality, may work to establish a more stable Maya pedigree for this tradition. The way these various points of view are expressed and placed in dialog with each other speaks to a dynamism and creativity which is typical of Maya culture at present and through time.
重新思考圣西蒙,融合和人类学权威
长期以来,危地马拉的圣Simón传统吸引了来自不同背景的外国和国内学者、游客和危地马拉人民的极大兴趣。许多人(尽管不是全部)被这个神的模糊性和多重身份所吸引,包括与佩德罗·德·阿尔瓦拉多和加略人犹大的联系,以及玛雅神玛姆等本土人物或其他土著历史和文化中的人物。在这篇文章中,主要基于1994年以来进行的民族志研究,我从一系列对话者那里追踪了关于San Simón的意见和评估,并考虑了这些意见和评估是如何随着时间的推移而发展的。我认为,当我们识别和解释“宗教混合”案例时,学术界尤其需要重新思考融合主义的概念,并指出在应用该术语时需要相当大的反身性。对于许多危地马拉原住民来说,特别是在社区层面,对于这个神的身份几乎没有任何矛盾或模糊的表达,这导致了“为谁融合”的问题?也就是说,其他人,尤其是那些参与(通常超出地方层面)玛雅灵性的推广和制度化的人,可能会努力为这一传统建立一个更稳定的玛雅血统。这些不同观点的表达方式和相互对话的方式体现了玛雅文化的活力和创造力,这是当今和历史上典型的玛雅文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信