There is only one stage domain

Sagun Giri, M. Commons, W. Harrigan
{"title":"There is only one stage domain","authors":"Sagun Giri, M. Commons, W. Harrigan","doi":"10.1037/H0101081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study used the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC) to test the theory that different domains in development would develop in synchrony, allowing an individual to solve tasks from various domains using the same mental structure for each task. The MHC instruments used were the empathy, helper person, counselor patient, breakup, caregiver, algebra, balance beam, infinity and laundry instruments. The instruments can be categorized as belonging to two different subdomains, the social subdomain, and the logic/mathematics/physical sciences subdomain. Instruments in this social subdomain measure developmental stage in a variety of social contexts. These social contexts included empathy for person after an accident, guidance and assistance by a helper, counseling patients, understanding romantic breakups, and caring for children and infants. The other subdomain is composed of mathematical (algebra & infinity), logical (laundry), and physical science (balance beam). In order to conclude how related the performances were, three analyses were carried out. First, Rasch analysis yielded person scores akin to person stage scores. Second, regression analysis was conducted to assess how well the order of hierarchical complexity (OHC) of the items predicted the Rasch difficulty of the items. Third a principal axis factoring was carried out with the person Rasch scores for every instrument. Irrespective of domains, if each instrument loaded on the first factor with all the factor scores over .7 and if the first factor accounted for more than 70% of the variance, then that would show that all instruments were part of a single domain. In each case the MHC accounted for a large amount of variance with r values over .7. The principal axis factoring showed that person scores on each instrument loaded on the first factor (90.51% of the variance). All the factor scores on the first factor were over .85. There were very low loadings only on the second factor (4.947% of the variance). This implies that the instruments from the social subdomain and instruments from the logic/mathematics/physical sciences belong to a single domain.","PeriodicalId":314223,"journal":{"name":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0101081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The study used the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC) to test the theory that different domains in development would develop in synchrony, allowing an individual to solve tasks from various domains using the same mental structure for each task. The MHC instruments used were the empathy, helper person, counselor patient, breakup, caregiver, algebra, balance beam, infinity and laundry instruments. The instruments can be categorized as belonging to two different subdomains, the social subdomain, and the logic/mathematics/physical sciences subdomain. Instruments in this social subdomain measure developmental stage in a variety of social contexts. These social contexts included empathy for person after an accident, guidance and assistance by a helper, counseling patients, understanding romantic breakups, and caring for children and infants. The other subdomain is composed of mathematical (algebra & infinity), logical (laundry), and physical science (balance beam). In order to conclude how related the performances were, three analyses were carried out. First, Rasch analysis yielded person scores akin to person stage scores. Second, regression analysis was conducted to assess how well the order of hierarchical complexity (OHC) of the items predicted the Rasch difficulty of the items. Third a principal axis factoring was carried out with the person Rasch scores for every instrument. Irrespective of domains, if each instrument loaded on the first factor with all the factor scores over .7 and if the first factor accounted for more than 70% of the variance, then that would show that all instruments were part of a single domain. In each case the MHC accounted for a large amount of variance with r values over .7. The principal axis factoring showed that person scores on each instrument loaded on the first factor (90.51% of the variance). All the factor scores on the first factor were over .85. There were very low loadings only on the second factor (4.947% of the variance). This implies that the instruments from the social subdomain and instruments from the logic/mathematics/physical sciences belong to a single domain.
只有一个阶段域
该研究使用了层次复杂性模型(MHC)来验证一个理论,即不同的发展领域将同步发展,允许个人使用相同的心理结构来解决每个任务的不同领域的任务。使用的MHC工具是移情、帮助者、咨询病人、分手、照顾者、代数、平衡木、无限和洗衣工具。这些工具可以分为两个不同的子领域,社会子领域和逻辑/数学/物理科学子领域。这个社会子领域的工具衡量了在各种社会背景下的发展阶段。这些社会环境包括对事故发生后的人的同情、帮助者的指导和帮助、对病人的咨询、对失恋的理解以及对儿童和婴儿的照顾。另一个子领域由数学(代数和无穷)、逻辑(洗衣)和物理科学(平衡木)组成。为了得出相关性能是如何,进行了三个分析。首先,Rasch分析得出的个人得分与个人阶段得分相似。其次,进行回归分析,评估项目层次复杂度排序对项目Rasch难度的预测效果。第三,对每个乐器的拉希评分进行主轴分解。无论哪个域,如果每个仪器加载的第一个因素的所有因素得分超过0.7,如果第一个因素占方差的70%以上,那么这将表明所有仪器都是单一域的一部分。在每种情况下,MHC都占了很大的方差,r值大于0.7。主轴因子分析表明,每个人在每个工具上的得分都集中在第一个因素上(方差的90.51%)。第一个因子的得分均在0.85以上。只有第二个因素的负荷非常低(方差的4.947%)。这意味着来自社会子领域的工具和来自逻辑/数学/物理科学的工具属于一个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信