Investigation of various algorithms on multichannel audio compression

T. Gunawan, Siti Aisyah Abdul Rashid, M. Kartiwi
{"title":"Investigation of various algorithms on multichannel audio compression","authors":"T. Gunawan, Siti Aisyah Abdul Rashid, M. Kartiwi","doi":"10.1109/ICSIMA.2017.8311985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multichannel audio or surround sound compression is rather more challenging to compress compare to mono and stereo audio. Nowadays, many methods and algorithms have been proposed to improve the compression performance on multichannel audio. This book focuses on performance evaluation of various algorithms on multichannel audio compression. First, we identified and investigated current state-of-the-art audio compression algorithms, both lossless and lossy compression, which can handle mono, stereo, 5.1, and 7.1 multichannel audio. Out of various algorithms available, AC3, AAC, and Ogg have been selected as lossy compression algorithms, while FLAC and MPEG-4 ALS have been chosen as lossless compression algorithms. Two performance measure were used in the experiments, i.e. compression ratio and encoding time. The results showed that among three lossy audio compression algorithms, AC3 has the fastest encoding time while Ogg Vorbis has the highest compression ratio. Furthermore, between FLAC and MPEG-4 ALS, FLAC has faster encoding time and MPEG-4 ALS has higher compression ratio. Overall, in terms of encoding time and compression ratio, it has been found that FLAC is the fastest coder while Ogg Vorbis has the highest compression ratio among five encoders evaluated.","PeriodicalId":137841,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA.2017.8311985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Multichannel audio or surround sound compression is rather more challenging to compress compare to mono and stereo audio. Nowadays, many methods and algorithms have been proposed to improve the compression performance on multichannel audio. This book focuses on performance evaluation of various algorithms on multichannel audio compression. First, we identified and investigated current state-of-the-art audio compression algorithms, both lossless and lossy compression, which can handle mono, stereo, 5.1, and 7.1 multichannel audio. Out of various algorithms available, AC3, AAC, and Ogg have been selected as lossy compression algorithms, while FLAC and MPEG-4 ALS have been chosen as lossless compression algorithms. Two performance measure were used in the experiments, i.e. compression ratio and encoding time. The results showed that among three lossy audio compression algorithms, AC3 has the fastest encoding time while Ogg Vorbis has the highest compression ratio. Furthermore, between FLAC and MPEG-4 ALS, FLAC has faster encoding time and MPEG-4 ALS has higher compression ratio. Overall, in terms of encoding time and compression ratio, it has been found that FLAC is the fastest coder while Ogg Vorbis has the highest compression ratio among five encoders evaluated.
多声道音频压缩的各种算法研究
与单声道和立体声音频相比,多声道音频或环绕声压缩更具挑战性。目前,人们提出了许多方法和算法来提高多声道音频的压缩性能。这本书的重点是在多通道音频压缩的各种算法的性能评估。首先,我们确定并研究了当前最先进的音频压缩算法,包括无损压缩和有损压缩,它们可以处理单声道、立体声、5.1和7.1多声道音频。在各种可用的算法中,已选择AC3, AAC和Ogg作为有损压缩算法,而已选择FLAC和MPEG-4 ALS作为无损压缩算法。实验中采用了压缩比和编码时间两个性能指标。结果表明,在三种有损音频压缩算法中,AC3的编码时间最快,Ogg Vorbis的压缩比最高。此外,在FLAC和MPEG-4 ALS之间,FLAC具有更快的编码时间,MPEG-4 ALS具有更高的压缩比。总的来说,在编码时间和压缩比方面,我们发现FLAC是最快的编码器,而Ogg Vorbis在评估的五种编码器中具有最高的压缩比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信