Optimal sensor architecture selection for health management of complex systems

Ivan Chamov, J. Ranieri, M. Vetterli, O. de Weck
{"title":"Optimal sensor architecture selection for health management of complex systems","authors":"Ivan Chamov, J. Ranieri, M. Vetterli, O. de Weck","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2016.7500713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With technological progress, humans tend to create engineering systems with constantly increasing complexity and higher operational requirements. Many complex systems require the use of a Health Management (HM) solution to ensure safety and enable lifecycle properties management of the system. HM solutions such as Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) hinge mainly on data obtained from sensors. Sensors or collections of sensors, forming sensor architectures constitute an important fraction of the cost of an HM solution and thus have to be carefully designed. However, the trade-off between cost and performance of a sensor architecture is not yet well understood. In the light of this, we have developed a Pareto optimal sensor architecture selection tool for dynamic systems, which integrates performance and cost and aims at aiding design decisions. The tool uses a performance metric based on Mean Square Error (MSE) and derived from the observability matrix of an estimated state space model for a nominal system operation as well as for different system failure modes. The tool is applied to a case study involving a ducted fan, which is a dynamic system and a common mechanical set-up used for propulsion applications. This system can exhibit different mechanical as well as electrical failure modes throughout its lifecycle, which can be managed using a sensor architecture. We consider 63 possible sensor architectures (all the possible combinations out of six sensors) and the tool reduces the choice to only 13 Pareto optimal ones.","PeriodicalId":150162,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2016.7500713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With technological progress, humans tend to create engineering systems with constantly increasing complexity and higher operational requirements. Many complex systems require the use of a Health Management (HM) solution to ensure safety and enable lifecycle properties management of the system. HM solutions such as Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) hinge mainly on data obtained from sensors. Sensors or collections of sensors, forming sensor architectures constitute an important fraction of the cost of an HM solution and thus have to be carefully designed. However, the trade-off between cost and performance of a sensor architecture is not yet well understood. In the light of this, we have developed a Pareto optimal sensor architecture selection tool for dynamic systems, which integrates performance and cost and aims at aiding design decisions. The tool uses a performance metric based on Mean Square Error (MSE) and derived from the observability matrix of an estimated state space model for a nominal system operation as well as for different system failure modes. The tool is applied to a case study involving a ducted fan, which is a dynamic system and a common mechanical set-up used for propulsion applications. This system can exhibit different mechanical as well as electrical failure modes throughout its lifecycle, which can be managed using a sensor architecture. We consider 63 possible sensor architectures (all the possible combinations out of six sensors) and the tool reduces the choice to only 13 Pareto optimal ones.
复杂系统健康管理的传感器结构优化选择
随着技术的进步,人类往往会创造出复杂性不断增加、操作要求不断提高的工程系统。许多复杂的系统需要使用健康管理(HM)解决方案来确保安全性并支持系统的生命周期属性管理。集成车辆健康管理(IVHM)等HM解决方案主要依赖于从传感器获得的数据。传感器或传感器集合,形成传感器架构构成了HM解决方案成本的重要部分,因此必须仔细设计。然而,传感器架构的成本和性能之间的权衡尚未得到很好的理解。鉴于此,我们开发了一个动态系统的帕累托最优传感器架构选择工具,它集成了性能和成本,旨在帮助设计决策。该工具使用一种基于均方误差(MSE)的性能度量,该性能度量来自于标称系统运行和不同系统故障模式的估计状态空间模型的可观察性矩阵。该工具应用于一个涉及导管风扇的案例研究,这是一个动态系统,也是用于推进应用的常见机械装置。该系统在其整个生命周期中可以表现出不同的机械和电气故障模式,这可以使用传感器架构进行管理。我们考虑了63种可能的传感器架构(六个传感器的所有可能组合),该工具将选择减少到只有13个帕累托最优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信