Migrants at the university doorstep

Anna-Leena Riitaoja, A. Virtanen, Nina Reiman, Tuija Lehtonen, Maija Yli-Jokipii, T. Udd, Leena Peniche-Ferreira
{"title":"Migrants at the university doorstep","authors":"Anna-Leena Riitaoja, A. Virtanen, Nina Reiman, Tuija Lehtonen, Maija Yli-Jokipii, T. Udd, Leena Peniche-Ferreira","doi":"10.47862/apples.112578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Finnish Government recently launched policies to meet labor shortage challenges, recruit highly skilled international workers. However, they overlook a skilled population already living in Finland, namely highly educated migrants. The problem is that migrants tend to be treated similarly, whether they are well-educated or not. This means that migrants are typically directed into low paying jobs. How is it possible to better develop this group with more effective career guidance? We believe an important answer lies in improved university education for migrants. This investigation is based on responses from surveys, interviews, and project evaluations. An analysis is made of three successful university-based short-term integration programs. The emerging questions include, to what extent are obstacles for migrants appropriately deliberated in universities? What can we learn from the three model programs? Should language learning be incorporated into advanced academic programs? The analysis includes how current practices constrain migrants’ access to university education. Even with positive intentions, the prevailing understanding of equality involves equal treatment for all, despite educational or other differences. In addition, simplistic understanding of language skills and learning appears to predominate how migrants are treated. Highly educated migrants face serious challenges when there is a disconnect between language training and one’s disciplinary studies. We surmise there are critical differences between general population language training programs and those situated within disciplinary departments. Analysis of the model programs reveals that a systematic and holistic approach for overcoming current challenges is possible but with an emphasis on sustainability.","PeriodicalId":409563,"journal":{"name":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.112578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Finnish Government recently launched policies to meet labor shortage challenges, recruit highly skilled international workers. However, they overlook a skilled population already living in Finland, namely highly educated migrants. The problem is that migrants tend to be treated similarly, whether they are well-educated or not. This means that migrants are typically directed into low paying jobs. How is it possible to better develop this group with more effective career guidance? We believe an important answer lies in improved university education for migrants. This investigation is based on responses from surveys, interviews, and project evaluations. An analysis is made of three successful university-based short-term integration programs. The emerging questions include, to what extent are obstacles for migrants appropriately deliberated in universities? What can we learn from the three model programs? Should language learning be incorporated into advanced academic programs? The analysis includes how current practices constrain migrants’ access to university education. Even with positive intentions, the prevailing understanding of equality involves equal treatment for all, despite educational or other differences. In addition, simplistic understanding of language skills and learning appears to predominate how migrants are treated. Highly educated migrants face serious challenges when there is a disconnect between language training and one’s disciplinary studies. We surmise there are critical differences between general population language training programs and those situated within disciplinary departments. Analysis of the model programs reveals that a systematic and holistic approach for overcoming current challenges is possible but with an emphasis on sustainability.
大学门口的移民
芬兰政府最近推出了应对劳动力短缺挑战的政策,招募高技能的国际工人。然而,他们忽视了已经生活在芬兰的技术人口,即受过高等教育的移民。问题在于,无论移民是否受过良好教育,他们往往都受到类似的对待。这意味着移民通常被导向低薪工作。如何通过更有效的职业指导来更好地发展这个群体?我们认为,一个重要的答案在于改善农民工的大学教育。这项调查是基于调查、访谈和项目评估的反馈。对三个成功的大学短期融合项目进行了分析。新出现的问题包括,大学在多大程度上适当地考虑了移民的障碍?我们能从这三个示范项目中学到什么?语言学习应该被纳入高级学术课程吗?该分析包括当前的做法如何限制移民接受大学教育。即使有积极的意图,对平等的普遍理解也包括平等对待所有人,不管教育或其他方面的差异。此外,对语言技能和学习的简单理解似乎在对待移民的方式中占主导地位。受过高等教育的移民面临着严重的挑战,因为语言培训和专业学习之间存在脱节。我们推测,在普通人群语言培训项目和那些位于学科部门之间的项目之间存在着重大差异。对模型方案的分析表明,克服当前挑战的系统和整体方法是可能的,但重点是可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信