{"title":"Microarchitecture choices (implementation of the VAX)","authors":"Y. Patt","doi":"10.1145/75362.75421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The VAX Architecture provides hardware implementors with an opportunity or a nightmare, depending on your point of view. Such characteristics as 304 opcodes, a large number of addressing modes, a large number of supported data types, and non-regularities in the ISA semantics all provide challenges to the microarchitect. The VAX architecture was introduced in 1977 with its first microarchitecture, the VAX 11/780, a TTL MSI implementation. Since then, there have been several distinct implementations, each reflecting (1) the technology in which it was implemented, (2) the performance/cost tradeoffs it was supposed to consider, and (3) the design methodology of its implementors. This paper is a first attempt at discussing several VAX implementations from the standpoint of the choices made in the microarchitecture as driven by the context of the device technology, the performance/cost tradeoffs, and other considerations.","PeriodicalId":365456,"journal":{"name":"MICRO 22","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MICRO 22","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/75362.75421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The VAX Architecture provides hardware implementors with an opportunity or a nightmare, depending on your point of view. Such characteristics as 304 opcodes, a large number of addressing modes, a large number of supported data types, and non-regularities in the ISA semantics all provide challenges to the microarchitect. The VAX architecture was introduced in 1977 with its first microarchitecture, the VAX 11/780, a TTL MSI implementation. Since then, there have been several distinct implementations, each reflecting (1) the technology in which it was implemented, (2) the performance/cost tradeoffs it was supposed to consider, and (3) the design methodology of its implementors. This paper is a first attempt at discussing several VAX implementations from the standpoint of the choices made in the microarchitecture as driven by the context of the device technology, the performance/cost tradeoffs, and other considerations.