Driving Factors for Purity of Withdrawn Hydrogen: A Numerical Study of Underground Hydrogen Storage with Various Cushion Gases

G. Wang, G. Pickup, K. Sorbie, E. Mackay
{"title":"Driving Factors for Purity of Withdrawn Hydrogen: A Numerical Study of Underground Hydrogen Storage with Various Cushion Gases","authors":"G. Wang, G. Pickup, K. Sorbie, E. Mackay","doi":"10.2118/209625-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The central objective of this study is to improve our current understanding of the hydrodynamic processes arising when hydrogen (H2) is stored in subsurface porous media. In this work, we compare the use of two cushion gases, namely carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), for H2storage ina synthetic aquifer. The impacts of viscous instability, gravity segregation, capillary trapping, and CO2 solubility in water on the recovery performance are investigated in detail.In the context of H2 storage, wefocus on both the amount and the purity of the H2that is back produced. A series of very fine-scale numerical simulationswas performed in 2D vertical systems using a fully compositional simulator. A simple three-stage operation strategy (cushion gas injection, H2 injection and H2 production) was designed to trigger the flow behaviour of interest. Based onscaling theory, we analysed the impacts of various mechanisms on the H2 recovery performance, from viscous dominated to gravity dominated flow regimes. Viscous instability and permeability heterogeneity may strongly degrade the purity of the back produced H2. No matter whichgas (CO2 or CH4) is selected as the cushion gas, the less viscous H2 infiltrates the cushion gas, meaning that the displacement does not proceed in a piston-like fashion. In the viscous-dominated scenario, H2 may even bypass the cushion gas of CO2, which subsequently leads to early breakthrough of the cushion gas and thus a dramatic reduction in H2 purity during back production. However, this effect does not arise in the case with CH4 as cushion gas. On the other hand, in the gravity-dominated case, the less dense H2 accumulates above the cushion gas and there is no flow infiltration or bypassing occurring in cases studied here. Therefore, the overall H2recovery performance is much better in the gravity-dominated regime than that in the viscous dominated regime. Finally, we demonstrate that it is important to include the solubility of CO2 when used as cushion gas in aquifer systems. This isbecause CO2 dissolution in water may significantly reduce its gas volume and lead to early water breakthrough during back production.","PeriodicalId":332644,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 07, 2022","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 07, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209625-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The central objective of this study is to improve our current understanding of the hydrodynamic processes arising when hydrogen (H2) is stored in subsurface porous media. In this work, we compare the use of two cushion gases, namely carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), for H2storage ina synthetic aquifer. The impacts of viscous instability, gravity segregation, capillary trapping, and CO2 solubility in water on the recovery performance are investigated in detail.In the context of H2 storage, wefocus on both the amount and the purity of the H2that is back produced. A series of very fine-scale numerical simulationswas performed in 2D vertical systems using a fully compositional simulator. A simple three-stage operation strategy (cushion gas injection, H2 injection and H2 production) was designed to trigger the flow behaviour of interest. Based onscaling theory, we analysed the impacts of various mechanisms on the H2 recovery performance, from viscous dominated to gravity dominated flow regimes. Viscous instability and permeability heterogeneity may strongly degrade the purity of the back produced H2. No matter whichgas (CO2 or CH4) is selected as the cushion gas, the less viscous H2 infiltrates the cushion gas, meaning that the displacement does not proceed in a piston-like fashion. In the viscous-dominated scenario, H2 may even bypass the cushion gas of CO2, which subsequently leads to early breakthrough of the cushion gas and thus a dramatic reduction in H2 purity during back production. However, this effect does not arise in the case with CH4 as cushion gas. On the other hand, in the gravity-dominated case, the less dense H2 accumulates above the cushion gas and there is no flow infiltration or bypassing occurring in cases studied here. Therefore, the overall H2recovery performance is much better in the gravity-dominated regime than that in the viscous dominated regime. Finally, we demonstrate that it is important to include the solubility of CO2 when used as cushion gas in aquifer systems. This isbecause CO2 dissolution in water may significantly reduce its gas volume and lead to early water breakthrough during back production.
抽氢纯度的驱动因素:不同缓冲气体地下储氢的数值研究
本研究的中心目标是提高我们目前对氢气(H2)储存在地下多孔介质中所产生的流体动力学过程的理解。在这项工作中,我们比较了两种缓冲气体的使用,即二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4),用于在合成含水层中储存h22。详细研究了黏性不稳定性、重力偏析、毛细捕集和CO2在水中的溶解度对采收率的影响。在氢气储存的背景下,我们关注的是氢气的数量和纯度。利用全合成模拟器在二维垂直系统中进行了一系列非常精细的数值模拟。设计了一个简单的三阶段操作策略(缓冲注气、注H2和产H2)来触发感兴趣的流动行为。基于结垢理论,我们分析了各种机制对H2回收性能的影响,从粘性主导流到重力主导流。黏性不稳定性和渗透率非均质性会严重降低回产氢气的纯度。无论选择哪种气体(CO2或CH4)作为缓冲气体,粘性较低的H2都会渗透到缓冲气体中,这意味着置换不会以活塞式的方式进行。在粘度占主导地位的情况下,H2甚至可能绕过缓冲气体CO2,这随后导致缓冲气体的早期突破,从而在回产过程中急剧降低H2纯度。然而,在以CH4作为缓冲气体的情况下,这种影响不会出现。另一方面,在重力占主导的情况下,较低密度的H2聚集在缓冲气体上方,本研究中没有发生流动渗透或旁通现象。因此,在重力主导下,整体的H2recovery性能要比在粘性主导下好得多。最后,我们证明了在含水层系统中作为缓冲气体时,包括二氧化碳的溶解度是很重要的。这是因为CO2在水中的溶解可能会显著减少其气体体积,导致回采过程中早期见水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信