Online Judge Support for Programming Teaching

2020 XLVI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI) Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1109/CLEI52000.2020.00067

Jeisson Hidalgo-Céspedes, Gabriela Marín-Raventós, Marta Eunice Calderón Campos

{"title":"Online Judge Support for Programming Teaching","authors":"Jeisson Hidalgo-Céspedes, Gabriela Marín-Raventós, Marta Eunice Calderón Campos","doi":"10.1109/CLEI52000.2020.00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online programming judges are considered useful and sometimes indispensable tools to support competitive programming, professionals' recruiting, and programming education. In this last field, the scientific literature on these tools focuses on the learners' needs, but neglects the requirements of the professors, even though they are who mainly decide whether or not an educational tool is adopted in the courses they teach. This article collected 132 functional requirements for educative online judges, from the scientific literature and programming teachers with experience in the use of this type of tool. To know the degree of support, the requirements were grouped into 27 categories, and a requirements verification was performed with four available educative online judges reported in a recent systematic literature review. A low degree of satisfaction of requirements was found. This result encourages future research to create tools that better support teaching-learning processes and the requirements collected are a useful contribution as a starting point for such research.","PeriodicalId":413655,"journal":{"name":"2020 XLVI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 XLVI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI52000.2020.00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Online programming judges are considered useful and sometimes indispensable tools to support competitive programming, professionals' recruiting, and programming education. In this last field, the scientific literature on these tools focuses on the learners' needs, but neglects the requirements of the professors, even though they are who mainly decide whether or not an educational tool is adopted in the courses they teach. This article collected 132 functional requirements for educative online judges, from the scientific literature and programming teachers with experience in the use of this type of tool. To know the degree of support, the requirements were grouped into 27 categories, and a requirements verification was performed with four available educative online judges reported in a recent systematic literature review. A low degree of satisfaction of requirements was found. This result encourages future research to create tools that better support teaching-learning processes and the requirements collected are a useful contribution as a starting point for such research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

程序设计教学的在线裁判支持

在线编程评审被认为是有用的，有时是不可或缺的工具，可以支持竞争性编程、专业人员招聘和编程教育。在最后一个领域，关于这些工具的科学文献关注的是学习者的需求，而忽略了教授的需求，尽管他们是决定是否在他们所教的课程中采用教育工具的主要人。本文收集了教育在线评审的132个功能需求，这些需求来自科学文献和具有使用此类工具经验的编程教师。为了了解支持的程度，需求被分成27个类别，并且需求验证是由最近系统的文献回顾中报告的四个可用的有教育意义的在线评审执行的。结果表明，满足要求的程度较低。这一结果鼓励未来的研究创造更好地支持教学过程的工具，而收集到的需求作为此类研究的起点是一个有用的贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2020 XLVI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)

自引率

0.00%

发文量