Comparative cost and return analysis of cassava production by adopters and non-adopters of improved cassava varieties among farmers in Ibesikpo Asutan LGA, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

K. Itam, Eucharia Agom Ajah, Mediong John Udoeyop
{"title":"Comparative cost and return analysis of cassava production by adopters and non-adopters of improved cassava varieties among farmers in Ibesikpo Asutan LGA, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria","authors":"K. Itam, Eucharia Agom Ajah, Mediong John Udoeyop","doi":"10.4314/gjass.v17i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a comparative cost and return analysis of cassava production by adopters and non-adopters of improved cassava varieties among farmers in Ibesikpo Asutan LGA, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 100 respondents in a ratio of 50 adopters and 50 non- adopters. Data were collected through questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Gross margin was carried out to estimate cost and return. Results revealed that females (68 % and 64 %) were dominant for both groups of cassava farmers. Majority (88 %) of the farmers were educated, implying that they would be more amenable to adopt technologies. The cost and return analysis shows that, total variable cost per hectare was N56,455.00 and N36,850.00 with a gross margin of N77,550.00 and N36,560.00 for adopters and non- adopters respectively, indicating that, cassava farming is profitable. Determinants of cassava production for both groups of farmers were farm size, cassava cuttings, fertilizer use and extension contact. Whereas increased farm size, cassava cuttings and extension contact significantly and positively influenced output of both groups of farmers, fertilizer use had a negative but significant influence on output of adopters, implying that fertilizer use resulted in decrease output of the adopters. The adopters are advice to discontinue the use of fertilizer. Furthermore, lack of awareness and high cost of inputs were among the major constraints to full adoption of improved cassava varieties in the study area. Therefore, it is recommended that policies aimed at improving farmer’s education and awareness should be redesign for proper implementation. Keywords: Comparative, cost and return, profitability, cassava, improved varieties, production, adopters, nonadopters","PeriodicalId":250072,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjass.v17i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This research is a comparative cost and return analysis of cassava production by adopters and non-adopters of improved cassava varieties among farmers in Ibesikpo Asutan LGA, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 100 respondents in a ratio of 50 adopters and 50 non- adopters. Data were collected through questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Gross margin was carried out to estimate cost and return. Results revealed that females (68 % and 64 %) were dominant for both groups of cassava farmers. Majority (88 %) of the farmers were educated, implying that they would be more amenable to adopt technologies. The cost and return analysis shows that, total variable cost per hectare was N56,455.00 and N36,850.00 with a gross margin of N77,550.00 and N36,560.00 for adopters and non- adopters respectively, indicating that, cassava farming is profitable. Determinants of cassava production for both groups of farmers were farm size, cassava cuttings, fertilizer use and extension contact. Whereas increased farm size, cassava cuttings and extension contact significantly and positively influenced output of both groups of farmers, fertilizer use had a negative but significant influence on output of adopters, implying that fertilizer use resulted in decrease output of the adopters. The adopters are advice to discontinue the use of fertilizer. Furthermore, lack of awareness and high cost of inputs were among the major constraints to full adoption of improved cassava varieties in the study area. Therefore, it is recommended that policies aimed at improving farmer’s education and awareness should be redesign for proper implementation. Keywords: Comparative, cost and return, profitability, cassava, improved varieties, production, adopters, nonadopters
尼日利亚阿夸伊博姆州Ibesikpo Asutan地区农民采用和未采用改良木薯品种的木薯生产成本和收益比较分析
本研究是对尼日利亚阿夸伊博姆州Ibesikpo Asutan LGA农民中采用和未采用改良木薯品种的木薯生产的成本和收益进行比较分析。采用多阶段抽样技术,以50名采用者和50名非采用者的比例选择100名受访者。通过问卷调查收集数据,并采用描述性统计和推断性统计进行分析。毛利率是用来估计成本和回报的。结果显示,在两组木薯农民中,女性(68%和64%)占主导地位。大多数(88%)农民受过教育,这意味着他们更容易接受技术。成本和收益分析表明,每公顷总可变成本为N56,455.00和N36,850.00,毛利率分别为N77,550.00和N36,560.00,表明木薯种植是有利可图的。对两组农民来说,决定木薯产量的因素是农场规模、木薯插枝、肥料使用和推广接触。虽然农场规模的增加、木薯插枝和推广接触对两组农民的产量都有显著的正向影响,但肥料的使用对采用者的产量有显著的负向影响,这意味着肥料的使用导致采用者的产量下降。建议采用者停止使用化肥。此外,缺乏认识和投入成本高是研究地区全面采用木薯改良品种的主要制约因素。因此,建议应重新设计旨在提高农民教育和意识的政策,以便适当实施。关键词:比较,成本与回报,盈利能力,木薯,改良品种,生产,采用者,非采用者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信