Body and dative external possessors in Old English

C. Allen
{"title":"Body and dative external possessors in Old English","authors":"C. Allen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198832263.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter documents the use of dative external possessors in Old English with words referring to the human body or parts of it and compares this with the use of internal possessors. It is shown that with subject and object possessa, dative external possessors were nearly restricted to situations in which the possessor was adversely affected, but they were in variation with internal possessors even in the earliest English in these situations, a variation that cannot be attributed to Latin influence. The widely held belief that dative external possessors were dominant over internal possessors in OE is probably due to the fact that previous studies have not distinguished possessa in the role of object of preposition, where the possessor did not have to be affected from other roles. The chapter establishes differences between the poetry and prose texts.","PeriodicalId":251092,"journal":{"name":"Dative External Possessors in Early English","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dative External Possessors in Early English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832263.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter documents the use of dative external possessors in Old English with words referring to the human body or parts of it and compares this with the use of internal possessors. It is shown that with subject and object possessa, dative external possessors were nearly restricted to situations in which the possessor was adversely affected, but they were in variation with internal possessors even in the earliest English in these situations, a variation that cannot be attributed to Latin influence. The widely held belief that dative external possessors were dominant over internal possessors in OE is probably due to the fact that previous studies have not distinguished possessa in the role of object of preposition, where the possessor did not have to be affected from other roles. The chapter establishes differences between the poetry and prose texts.
古英语的体和与格外部所有格
这一章记录了古英语中与人体或人体部分有关的词的外部所有格的使用,并将其与内部所有格的使用进行了比较。研究表明,在主语和宾语的情况下,与格外部所有人几乎仅限于所有人受到不利影响的情况,但在这些情况下,即使在最早的英语中,它们也与内部所有人有变化,这种变化不能归因于拉丁的影响。人们普遍认为,与格的外部所有人在OE中占主导地位,而不是内部所有人,这可能是由于以前的研究没有区分介词宾语角色中的所有人,在这种情况下,所有人不必受到其他角色的影响。这一章确立了诗歌和散文文本之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信