Philosophy of Education as an accidental trickle

Patrick Mbogo Mwaniki
{"title":"Philosophy of Education as an accidental trickle","authors":"Patrick Mbogo Mwaniki","doi":"10.4314/JOLTE.V2I1.52008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper recalls a Thomistic dictum quidquid recipitur ad modum recipietis recipitur to the effect that, somewhat, everything is received in the manner of the recipient, and which, for the purposes of the paper shall be rendered to signify that the operations of any thing - en, entis - cannot exceed its nature, and at the level of particulars would mean that the capabilities of any thing cannot exceed those of its essence. Thus, the dictum only served as a reminder to the fact that we  know as much of reality as our predispositions allow, and once we have had our \"fill,\" its  effect cannot possibly exceed it as cause.  Based on an Aristotelean-Thomistic-Gilsonean philosophical framework, and employing an anecdotic, hypothetical quasi scenario-building methodology to visit learning and teaching of philosophy of education and the career-building in the field at our universities, it attempts, through again, a quasi Socratic method, to intimate that the effects cannot possibly exceed their causes, and so, in Africa and in the world at large, philosophy of education will yield as much progress as that of its teachers as its causes and principles. Key words : Philosophy, education, Thomas, Africa, Kenya, university","PeriodicalId":447944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language, Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language, Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JOLTE.V2I1.52008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper recalls a Thomistic dictum quidquid recipitur ad modum recipietis recipitur to the effect that, somewhat, everything is received in the manner of the recipient, and which, for the purposes of the paper shall be rendered to signify that the operations of any thing - en, entis - cannot exceed its nature, and at the level of particulars would mean that the capabilities of any thing cannot exceed those of its essence. Thus, the dictum only served as a reminder to the fact that we  know as much of reality as our predispositions allow, and once we have had our "fill," its  effect cannot possibly exceed it as cause.  Based on an Aristotelean-Thomistic-Gilsonean philosophical framework, and employing an anecdotic, hypothetical quasi scenario-building methodology to visit learning and teaching of philosophy of education and the career-building in the field at our universities, it attempts, through again, a quasi Socratic method, to intimate that the effects cannot possibly exceed their causes, and so, in Africa and in the world at large, philosophy of education will yield as much progress as that of its teachers as its causes and principles. Key words : Philosophy, education, Thomas, Africa, Kenya, university
教育哲学是偶然的涓涓细流
这篇论文回顾了托马斯的格言ququid recipient and modern recipient,大意是,在某种程度上,一切都是以接受者的方式被接受的,为了本文的目的,这意味着任何事物的运作——甚至是实体——都不能超过它的本质,在细节的层面上,这意味着任何事物的能力都不能超过它的本质。因此,这句格言只是提醒我们这样一个事实,即我们对现实的了解是我们的倾向所允许的,一旦我们“充实”了,它的结果就不可能超过它的原因。基于亚里士多德-托马斯-吉尔索内的哲学框架,并采用一种轶事式的、假设式的准情景构建方法来考察我们大学里教育哲学的学习和教学以及这一领域的职业发展,它试图再次通过一种准苏格拉底的方法来表明,结果不可能超过原因,因此,在非洲和整个世界,教育哲学产生的进步与其教师的进步一样多,其原因和原则也一样多。关键词:哲学,教育,托马斯,非洲,肯尼亚,大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信