Novel Method for classification of Hepatitis C Using Support Vector Machine Classifier

D. Sravanthi, J. D
{"title":"Novel Method for classification of Hepatitis C Using Support Vector Machine Classifier","authors":"D. Sravanthi, J. D","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to figure out the presence of Novel Hepatitis C Detection using modern classifiers, and comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity between SVM (Support Vector Machine) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbour) Classifiers. Materials and Methods: In this study, data was gathered via the kaggle website. According to clinicalc.com, samples were taken into account as $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for SVM and $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for K-NN, with the total sample size being determined using the following parameters: enrollment ratio of 0.1, 95% confidence interval, G power of 80%, and alpha error-threshold value of 0.05. With a standard data set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using MATLAB. Results: Independent sample t test SPSS software compares accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Between the K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier and Support Vector Machine Classifier, there is a statistically significant difference. In comparison to SVM, the K-NN performed better with $\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{p}=0.026}$, p<0.05 accuracy (0.42%), $\\mathbf{p=0.021}$, p<0.05 sensitivity (0.43%), and $\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{p}=0.001, \\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$ specificity (0.43%). Conclusion: K-NN showed better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity than SVM to predict Novel Hepatitis C Detection in a faster way.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to figure out the presence of Novel Hepatitis C Detection using modern classifiers, and comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity between SVM (Support Vector Machine) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbour) Classifiers. Materials and Methods: In this study, data was gathered via the kaggle website. According to clinicalc.com, samples were taken into account as $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for SVM and $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for K-NN, with the total sample size being determined using the following parameters: enrollment ratio of 0.1, 95% confidence interval, G power of 80%, and alpha error-threshold value of 0.05. With a standard data set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using MATLAB. Results: Independent sample t test SPSS software compares accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Between the K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier and Support Vector Machine Classifier, there is a statistically significant difference. In comparison to SVM, the K-NN performed better with $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p}=0.026}$, p<0.05 accuracy (0.42%), $\mathbf{p=0.021}$, p<0.05 sensitivity (0.43%), and $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p}=0.001, \mathrm{p} < 0.05}$ specificity (0.43%). Conclusion: K-NN showed better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity than SVM to predict Novel Hepatitis C Detection in a faster way.
基于支持向量机分类器的丙型肝炎分类新方法
目的:本研究的目的是利用现代分类器找出新型丙型肝炎检测的存在,并比较SVM(支持向量机)和K-NN (k -近邻)分类器的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。材料和方法:本研究通过kaggle网站收集数据。根据clinicalc.com的资料,SVM取$\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$, K-NN取$\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$,总样本量采用以下参数确定:入组比为0.1,95%置信区间,G幂为80%,alpha误差阈值为0.05。使用标准数据集,使用MATLAB计算准确性、灵敏度和特异性。结果:独立样本t检验SPSS软件比较准确性、敏感性和特异性。在k近邻分类器和支持向量机分类器之间,有统计学上显著的差异。与SVM相比,K-NN在$\boldsymbol{\ mathm {p}=0.026}$, p<0.05精度(0.42%)、$\mathbf{p=0.021}$, p<0.05灵敏度(0.43%)和$\boldsymbol{\ mathm {p}=0.001, \ mathm {p} <0.05}$特异性(0.43%)方面表现更好。结论:K-NN预测新型丙型肝炎的准确率、灵敏度、特异性均优于SVM,预测速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信