{"title":"Novel Method for classification of Hepatitis C Using Support Vector Machine Classifier","authors":"D. Sravanthi, J. D","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to figure out the presence of Novel Hepatitis C Detection using modern classifiers, and comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity between SVM (Support Vector Machine) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbour) Classifiers. Materials and Methods: In this study, data was gathered via the kaggle website. According to clinicalc.com, samples were taken into account as $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for SVM and $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for K-NN, with the total sample size being determined using the following parameters: enrollment ratio of 0.1, 95% confidence interval, G power of 80%, and alpha error-threshold value of 0.05. With a standard data set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using MATLAB. Results: Independent sample t test SPSS software compares accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Between the K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier and Support Vector Machine Classifier, there is a statistically significant difference. In comparison to SVM, the K-NN performed better with $\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{p}=0.026}$, p<0.05 accuracy (0.42%), $\\mathbf{p=0.021}$, p<0.05 sensitivity (0.43%), and $\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{p}=0.001, \\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$ specificity (0.43%). Conclusion: K-NN showed better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity than SVM to predict Novel Hepatitis C Detection in a faster way.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to figure out the presence of Novel Hepatitis C Detection using modern classifiers, and comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity between SVM (Support Vector Machine) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbour) Classifiers. Materials and Methods: In this study, data was gathered via the kaggle website. According to clinicalc.com, samples were taken into account as $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for SVM and $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{N}=22)}$ for K-NN, with the total sample size being determined using the following parameters: enrollment ratio of 0.1, 95% confidence interval, G power of 80%, and alpha error-threshold value of 0.05. With a standard data set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using MATLAB. Results: Independent sample t test SPSS software compares accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Between the K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier and Support Vector Machine Classifier, there is a statistically significant difference. In comparison to SVM, the K-NN performed better with $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p}=0.026}$, p<0.05 accuracy (0.42%), $\mathbf{p=0.021}$, p<0.05 sensitivity (0.43%), and $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p}=0.001, \mathrm{p} < 0.05}$ specificity (0.43%). Conclusion: K-NN showed better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity than SVM to predict Novel Hepatitis C Detection in a faster way.