Vent for Surplus or Productivity Breakthrough? The Ghanaian Cocoa Take‐Off, C. 1890–1936

G. Austin
{"title":"Vent for Surplus or Productivity Breakthrough? The Ghanaian Cocoa Take‐Off, C. 1890–1936","authors":"G. Austin","doi":"10.1111/1468-0289.12043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a case-study of cocoa-farming in Ghana, this paper takes up the longrunning but recently neglected debate about the ‘cash crop revolution’ in tropical Africa during the early colonial period. It focuses on the supply side, using quantitative evidence as far as possible, to test the much criticised but never superseded ‘vent-for-surplus’ interpretation of the export expansion as a substitution of labour for leisure. The paper argues that while the model captured certain features of the case, such as the application of labour to underused land, its defining claim about labour is without empirical foundation. Rather, the evidence points to a reallocation of resources from existing market activities towards the adoption of an exotic crop, entailing a shift towards a new, qualitatively different and more profitable kind of production function. This innovation is best understood in the context of the long-term search of African producers for ways of realising the economic potential of their resource of relatively abundant land, while ameliorating the constraints which the environment put upon its use.","PeriodicalId":287161,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic History Review","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.12043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Through a case-study of cocoa-farming in Ghana, this paper takes up the longrunning but recently neglected debate about the ‘cash crop revolution’ in tropical Africa during the early colonial period. It focuses on the supply side, using quantitative evidence as far as possible, to test the much criticised but never superseded ‘vent-for-surplus’ interpretation of the export expansion as a substitution of labour for leisure. The paper argues that while the model captured certain features of the case, such as the application of labour to underused land, its defining claim about labour is without empirical foundation. Rather, the evidence points to a reallocation of resources from existing market activities towards the adoption of an exotic crop, entailing a shift towards a new, qualitatively different and more profitable kind of production function. This innovation is best understood in the context of the long-term search of African producers for ways of realising the economic potential of their resource of relatively abundant land, while ameliorating the constraints which the environment put upon its use.
过剩发泄还是生产力突破?加纳可可豆的腾飞,约1890-1936
通过对加纳可可种植的案例研究,本文讨论了早期殖民时期热带非洲“经济作物革命”的长期争论,但最近被忽视了。它关注的是供给面,尽可能使用定量证据,来检验备受批评但从未被取代的“以剩余换取出口”的解释,即出口扩张是劳动力取代休闲。本文认为,虽然该模型捕捉到了案例的某些特征,例如劳动力在未充分利用的土地上的应用,但其关于劳动力的定义主张缺乏经验基础。相反,证据表明,从现有市场活动中重新分配资源,以采用一种外来作物,导致转向一种新的、质量不同的和更有利可图的生产功能。在非洲生产者长期寻找实现其相对丰富的土地资源的经济潜力的方法的背景下,最好理解这种创新,同时减轻环境对其使用的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信