Histories of Science, Exploration, and Scientific Institutions Around the Pacific Rim

M. Osborne
{"title":"Histories of Science, Exploration, and Scientific Institutions Around the Pacific Rim","authors":"M. Osborne","doi":"10.2307/3983539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and Scientific Institutions Around the Pacific Rim Claudian, to the likes of Sannazaro, Spenser, Drayton, and Milton —Herendeen shows that the development of \"history;' of historistic thinking, in Mediterranean and European culture — and, indeed, of the notions of community, citizen, and nation—cannot be separated from the development, refinement, and amplification of notions of topos and archetypal topoi, particularly of the river. He shows in addition, or as a result— and particularly in his discussion of Drayton's Poly-Olbion —that the origins of landscape art and nature appreciation, in which \"landscape acquires a value of its own, apart from its historical credentials\" (p. 307), are as much to be found in shifting political currents of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, particularly in Britain, as they are in the Dutch landscape painters of the seventeenth century or the formal dualism of Descartes — and, indeed — if only by implication—that perhaps those Dutch landscapes and even Descartes' dualism are responses to changing political circumstances, the breakdown of topoi that had initially made inseparable the citizen, the community, and what we have since come to call the landscape. At its best, then, Herendeen's is a powerful and revealing book. At its worst, it gets one so wound up in tracking the detailed, figural history of \"the river\"— or so concerned about its author's enthusiasms for and comparative evaluations of \"river poems\" and \"river poets\"— that one can easily lose track of its main, and important, argument. What impedes here are not only the philosophical difficulties, but the notion of the \"river petem\" as a distinct genre (are we then to consider \"bird poems\" or \"snake poems\" or \"love poems\" as genres?), and the toofrequent intrusions of bits and pieces of contemporary hydrology, limnology, and watershed management into the explication of pre-Enlightenment poems and poets — poems that take on \"riverine elements\" and \"riverine characters;' and poets who serve \"riparian\" apprenticeships. The effort to blend the scientific and the literary, the environmental and the stylistic, would be more appreciable if the topoi hadn't changed so much in the last three hundred years.","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and Scientific Institutions Around the Pacific Rim Claudian, to the likes of Sannazaro, Spenser, Drayton, and Milton —Herendeen shows that the development of "history;' of historistic thinking, in Mediterranean and European culture — and, indeed, of the notions of community, citizen, and nation—cannot be separated from the development, refinement, and amplification of notions of topos and archetypal topoi, particularly of the river. He shows in addition, or as a result— and particularly in his discussion of Drayton's Poly-Olbion —that the origins of landscape art and nature appreciation, in which "landscape acquires a value of its own, apart from its historical credentials" (p. 307), are as much to be found in shifting political currents of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, particularly in Britain, as they are in the Dutch landscape painters of the seventeenth century or the formal dualism of Descartes — and, indeed — if only by implication—that perhaps those Dutch landscapes and even Descartes' dualism are responses to changing political circumstances, the breakdown of topoi that had initially made inseparable the citizen, the community, and what we have since come to call the landscape. At its best, then, Herendeen's is a powerful and revealing book. At its worst, it gets one so wound up in tracking the detailed, figural history of "the river"— or so concerned about its author's enthusiasms for and comparative evaluations of "river poems" and "river poets"— that one can easily lose track of its main, and important, argument. What impedes here are not only the philosophical difficulties, but the notion of the "river petem" as a distinct genre (are we then to consider "bird poems" or "snake poems" or "love poems" as genres?), and the toofrequent intrusions of bits and pieces of contemporary hydrology, limnology, and watershed management into the explication of pre-Enlightenment poems and poets — poems that take on "riverine elements" and "riverine characters;' and poets who serve "riparian" apprenticeships. The effort to blend the scientific and the literary, the environmental and the stylistic, would be more appreciable if the topoi hadn't changed so much in the last three hundred years.
环太平洋地区科学、探索和科学机构的历史
克劳迪安,对桑那扎罗、斯宾塞、德雷顿和弥尔顿等人来说,赫伦登表明,地中海和欧洲文化中历史主义思想的“历史”发展,以及社区、公民和国家概念的发展,不能与地形和原型地形概念的发展、完善和扩大分离,特别是河流的概念。他除此之外,或在他的讨论结果,特别是德雷顿的Poly-Olbion——景观艺术的起源和自然升值,在“景观获得自己的价值,除了历史凭证”(p . 307),都是在转移的政治潮流16和17世纪早期,晚期尤其在英国,在17世纪荷兰的风景画家或正式的笛卡尔二元论而且,事实上——如果仅仅是暗示的话——也许那些荷兰的风景,甚至笛卡尔的二元论,都是对不断变化的政治环境的回应,对最初使公民、社区和我们后来所说的风景不可分割的地形的崩溃的回应。从最好的角度来说,海伦丁的书是一本有力且发人深省的书。最糟糕的是,它会让读者沉迷于追踪“河流”的详细、人物历史,或者关注作者对“河流诗歌”和“河流诗人”的热情和比较评价,以至于读者很容易忘记它的主要、重要的论点。这里的障碍不仅是哲学上的困难,而且是“河诗”作为一种独特体类的概念(那么我们是否可以将“鸟诗”或“蛇诗”或“爱情诗”视为体类?),以及当代水文学、湖泊学和流域管理的零碎内容过于频繁地侵入启蒙运动前的诗歌和诗人的解释——这些诗歌带有“河流元素”和“河流人物”;以及为“河岸”学徒服务的诗人。如果在过去的三百年里,地形没有发生如此大的变化,那么将科学与文学、环境与风格融合在一起的努力将会更加值得赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信