Inhibition of Renin-angiotensin System and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19

Rasool Karimi Matloub, H. Ghadimi, Saeed Karimi Matloub, J. Khodadadi, Javad Tafaroji, S. Khani
{"title":"Inhibition of Renin-angiotensin System and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19","authors":"Rasool Karimi Matloub, H. Ghadimi, Saeed Karimi Matloub, J. Khodadadi, Javad Tafaroji, S. Khani","doi":"10.32598/jvc.3.1.114.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: COVID-19 is an acute respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A few studies with conflicting results have been performed to evaluate the relationship between the use of angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19 outcomes. Therefore, this study was performed to compare the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in two groups of patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the control group (no history of ACEIs/ARBs) in Kamkar and Shahid Beheshti hospitals in Qom City, Iran from March 14, 2019, to the end of September 21, 2020. Materials and Methods: This retrospective descriptive study was performed by reviewing the medical record of 359 patients with COVID-19, which was confirmed by a physician via lung scan or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used the independent t test to compare quantitative variables and the Chi-square test to analyze qualitative variables. Results: The common clinical symptoms, number of hospitalization days, oxygen saturation, and lung involvement were not significantly different between the two groups. Weakness, nausea, and sweating were significantly reduced in the control group compared to the ACEIs/ARBs group (P<0.05). Regarding the biochemical study, the patients’ hemoglobin levels and lymphocyte count on the first day of hospitalization in the ACEIs/ARBs group were significantly lower than the control (P<0.05) Conclusion: These findings do not provide evidence of adverse or beneficial effects of angiotensin system inhibitors, so we require more detailed studies with a larger sample size.","PeriodicalId":318985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vessels and Circulation","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vessels and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jvc.3.1.114.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: COVID-19 is an acute respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A few studies with conflicting results have been performed to evaluate the relationship between the use of angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19 outcomes. Therefore, this study was performed to compare the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in two groups of patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the control group (no history of ACEIs/ARBs) in Kamkar and Shahid Beheshti hospitals in Qom City, Iran from March 14, 2019, to the end of September 21, 2020. Materials and Methods: This retrospective descriptive study was performed by reviewing the medical record of 359 patients with COVID-19, which was confirmed by a physician via lung scan or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used the independent t test to compare quantitative variables and the Chi-square test to analyze qualitative variables. Results: The common clinical symptoms, number of hospitalization days, oxygen saturation, and lung involvement were not significantly different between the two groups. Weakness, nausea, and sweating were significantly reduced in the control group compared to the ACEIs/ARBs group (P<0.05). Regarding the biochemical study, the patients’ hemoglobin levels and lymphocyte count on the first day of hospitalization in the ACEIs/ARBs group were significantly lower than the control (P<0.05) Conclusion: These findings do not provide evidence of adverse or beneficial effects of angiotensin system inhibitors, so we require more detailed studies with a larger sample size.
肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制与COVID-19临床结局
背景与目的:COVID-19是由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)引起的急性呼吸道疾病。为了评估血管紧张素系统抑制剂的使用与COVID-19结局之间的关系,已经进行了一些结果相互矛盾的研究。因此,本研究比较了2019年3月14日至2020年9月21日在伊朗库姆市Kamkar和Shahid Beheshti医院接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)治疗的两组患者和对照组(无ACEIs/ARBs病史)的COVID-19患者的临床和临床旁特征。材料和方法:本回顾性描述性研究通过回顾359例COVID-19患者的病历,由医生通过肺部扫描或逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)证实。定量变量比较采用独立t检验,定性变量分析采用卡方检验。结果:两组患者的常见临床症状、住院天数、血氧饱和度、肺部受累无显著差异。与acei /ARBs组相比,对照组的虚弱、恶心和出汗明显减少(P<0.05)。在生化研究方面,ACEIs/ARBs组患者入院第一天血红蛋白水平和淋巴细胞计数均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:这些发现并不能证明血管紧张素系统抑制剂的作用是有利还是不利,因此我们需要更详细、更大样本量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信